arctic Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 (edited) I use Abiword, i find it much nicer than OOo. I didnt use OOo much at all i gave abiword a try, but if i want to write scientific texts, then abiword fails to do the job, so i have to use, big, bulky Oo. Edited August 7, 2004 by arctic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonMage Posted August 7, 2004 Report Share Posted August 7, 2004 That configuration should be enough (that is 320 [three hundred and twenty] megabytes of memory, right?) I mean.. I tried Mandrake 10 on a P3-450 -128 MB of RAM and it runs kde ok.. just a bit slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iphitus Posted August 8, 2004 Report Share Posted August 8, 2004 Y'know, i think that was a Yes, you can run mandrake on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urza9814 Posted August 8, 2004 Report Share Posted August 8, 2004 (edited) I'm running mandy 9.2 on a celeron 667, runs fine, but with 10.0 it goes soo slow...literally took 2-3 minutes to load up firefox. and that's with 320MB SDRAM FYI and about 5 gigs of swap :P If you've got less than 2 gigs of swap there's no way...lol Edited August 8, 2004 by Urza9814 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwiftDeath Posted August 9, 2004 Report Share Posted August 9, 2004 I think you'll be fine cause I run Xandros on an AMD 900 on my moms comp. I'd recommend using a Swap Partition and maybe using any DE/WM but KDE, cause that one is very memory intensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuxxer Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 Celeron 800, 320MB memory Anyone has hardware as low as this to run Mdk 10.0? and how is the performance? Thanks. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> P2 233 mhz with 320 meg of ram Had problems loading it though , everything went okay ,then went to log in and it seems only grub and bash worked. So reloaded 9.1 and then loaded 10 via the upgrade option, worked fine ,but i assume using the 2.4 kernel , rather than the 2.6 Tux Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.