ramfree17 Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-6228_11-5...0.html?tag=e019 and then the rebuke which i find really hilarious ... http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/brown/ ciao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidzoo Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 :lol2: I read that and about fell off my chair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linux_learner Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 now thats just pathetic. but then when i heard linus wasnt the father of linux, i knew that was bogus. whats sad is the news bought this guys report as credible. thank you Andy Tanenbaum for setting the record straight officially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iphitus Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 hehe, thats like saying im insane -- its total and utter nonsense... erm... ok... maybe not That is a joke, of course linus wrote it, he aint no idiot... this reminds me of the theories that the moon mission was faked...... buuuuuulllllllllllltish!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ral Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 Ken Brown's Motivation, Release 1.2 http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/brown/followup/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannonfodder Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 Of course, he was just a kid and didn't know better (although if he had paid better attention in class he should have Remember to contact your local papers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkelve Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archi...ay/uf006723.gif ROFLMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramfree17 Posted May 24, 2004 Author Share Posted May 24, 2004 http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archi...ay/uf006723.gif ROFLMAO! that link will get you the nag image. are you referring to this one http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20040523 ? ciao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkelve Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 (edited) Uuuh? For me, these links are the same?? Mind you, I'm surfing with images disabled, if that changes anything? Edited May 24, 2004 by Darkelve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramfree17 Posted May 24, 2004 Author Share Posted May 24, 2004 sometimes it will but sometimes it will show you a userfriendly nag image. i think it has something to do with the way a browser is redirected to a the site . our web developers here might be able to shed more light on how they do it because i dont really know. ciao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkelve Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 sometimes it will but sometimes it will show you a userfriendly nag image. i think it has something to do with the way a browser is redirected to a the site . our web developers here might be able to shed more light on how they do it because i dont really know. ciao! you mean the way in which browsers handle a http request for redirection? http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html -> 10.3 ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramfree17 Posted May 26, 2004 Author Share Posted May 26, 2004 t-o-o m-u-c-h i-n-f-o-r-m-a-t-i-o-n-.-.-.-.-. /ramfree17''s head explodes.. :D ciao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now