Jump to content

Anyone use(d) following scanners with MD9.0?


finlay
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has anyone used any of the following budget USB scanners with Mandrake 9.0?

Mustek 1220 USB Plus

Canon Canoscan 646u

Canon Canoscan LiDE 20

 

I have failed to get my Umax parallel scanner to work and I'll buy one of the above if anyone can assure me that it works! However, even at the low prices of these scanners I'm not willing just to take a gamble. Please let me know if you have good reason to believe any of them works.

 

Finlay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Umax 1220 worked fine under older releases of Mandrake in spite of not being in the supported list. So the support list isn't absolute. And upgrading to the latest version of the OS isn't foolproof either - quite the opposite! Thanks for the replies. Still dodgy about buying new. I'll try the updates first. Many thanks for your help.

 

Finlay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I have tried updating SANE snd tweaking dll.conf and umax_pp.conf - all to no avail :(

I'm told there is a patch for parallel scanners in the cooker. So maybe I'll just wait...

In the meantime I'm interested to hear about the Mustek (Now selling at Safeway in Britain for £35 - $53, Steve Scrimpshire!) It can't be any good at that price, can it? :wink:

 

Finlay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no graphic artist, so I couldn't give you technical comparisons, but it scans fine on mine. The pics may come out a little dark, but nothing a little brightness/contrast can't fix.

 

(I almost forgot I could give you examples...)

 

All these pics were scanned with it:

 

http://66.139.79.197/~omarsere/Images/Steve.jpg - Original is meant to be very dark.

http://66.139.79.197/~omarsere/Images/Guardian.gif - On black paper, very dark (pastels)

http://66.139.79.197/~omarsere/Images/macaw.gif - W/C marker pointillism

http://66.139.79.197/~omarsere/Images/pride.gif - Dk blue paper (pastels)

 

All pics © 1996,1999,2000 - Steven B. Scrimpshire except photo, which is © 1998 - Matthew Hight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My USB Mustek 1200 scans so well I had to increase my temp file size to over 120 mb. It scans much better than it ever did in windows. I can actualy scan my own fingerprints but it takes forever.

 

Try using the 1200 drivers in Xsane and sane. They might work.

 

The scanner is so cheap how could you go wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mandrake_Mouse

Been running the Mustek 1200 UB on my machine with 9.0 for a couple of months now. Scans lots cleaner than it did with native Windoze drivers. Didn't have to tweak a thing. USB recognized right out of the box, and had XSane running within minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, i went out and bought the Mustek. BUT... Harddrake detects it as a Trust Flatscan USB 19200 on /dev/usb/scanner0. First, there is no such file under /dev/usb/ The only entry I have there is lp0. Secondly, since the model it recognizes isn't in the database, I've tried configuring it as Trust Compact Scan USB 19200, Mustek ScanExpress 1200 UB, Mustek ScanExpress 12090 USB, 1200CU Plus. None of these work. Of course if I don't have /dev/usb/scanner0 none of them will. Does any one have any ideas?

 

Finlay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...