Jump to content

ATI AIW 9800 Pro card


thinhla
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have the said card which during installation didn't get 3D enabled. I have noticed that most screensavers are definitely faster(not those ones that use 3D engines and OpenGL) as opposed to 3D accereration selected during installation.

 

My question is how do I re-enable or disable again in the future 3D acceleration? I don't see any options to do it in system configuration tool.

 

Another question is: Should I download and install the driver on ATI website? I currently use LE2005 on i686 machine.

 

No matter what I select, whether it's a 2D or 3D accelleration, I get a nasty windown trailing (like mouse trailing in MS Windows) if having couple of web browser windows up and moving a window accross the screen/desktop

 

I don't know if this is a major common issue with ATI card. If it is, ATI card is not linux friendly after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the open ource video driver don't provide for 3d acceleration so you have to install the ati drivers.

 

 

Off I go to test install ATI driver

 

I download ati driver

 

try to install Xorg-X11 using urpmi xorg-x11 but couln'd since it says the package has already been installed. (I am currently using LE2005)

 

download kernel-source which is believe is v2.6.11 for LE2005

install and make directory link

ln -s /usr/src/<kernel source folder> /usr/src/linux

 

change to run level 3

install rpm ati package

 

configure using fglrxconfig

save the file

<it reports PCI bus detect PCI:1:0:0 and put R350 [NH) in use>

 

startx

 

Everthing is like before, nothing seem change

 

My question is: I have the AGP 9800 Pro AIW card, ATI only detects PCI bus and put driver for R350 (NH) to use. It doens't say ASP 9800 Pro any where. How do I set manually for it to regconize the main card.

 

Has anyone known of success strory installing AIW 9800 card with LE2005

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Successfull install with some improve Frame rate to about 900 (not as someone claims to be above 1500) in 5s using glxgears but still a nasty trailing if moving a window accross screen.

 

I guess I want 2D performance.Since it's a dual-head card, I am think that I use the other head instead of the high performance one. Here's the output:

 

$ glxgears
4036 frames in 5.0 seconds = 807.200 FPS
4580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 916.000 FPS
4580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 916.000 FPS
4580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 916.000 FPS
4579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 915.800 FPS
4579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 915.800 FPS
4580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 916.000 FPS
4579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 915.800 FPS

glxinfo | grep direct
direct rendering: Yes

glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9800 Pro Generic
OpenGL version string: 1.3.5140 (X4.3.0-8.14.13)
OpenGL extensions:

 

It looks about right? But 2D performance is very bad.

Edited by thinhla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...