Jump to content

network stability


jaraeez
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have a starnge problem which has only surfaced when I installed 10.1 (clean install). I ran MDK 10 with no problems whatsoever with regards to my eth connection. My problem is that I have an USR wireless pci nic which is running with the help of Driverloader. This is the exact same setup as I had in MDK 10, but in 10.1 I have noticed that after about 45 mins or so I get a slight lag intermittenly. When I ping before the 45 mins mark this is my result

 

PING 192.168.1.1 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=1.51 ms
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=1.51 ms
--- jaraeez ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6005ms

 

& after the 45 min mark

 

PING 192.168.1.1  56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=1.52 ms
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=3.72 ms
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=16 ttl=128 time=787 ms
64 bytes from jaraeez (192.168.1.1): icmp_seq=22 ttl=128 time=3.10 ms
--- jaraeez ping statistics ---
24 packets transmitted, 8 received, 66% packet loss, time 23004ms

 

To be honest I am at a complete loss as to why this is happening. I have updated 10.1, checked logs, etc.. with no clues.

 

ifconfig shows

 

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:49:CB:EE:62
         inet addr:192.168.1.22  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
         inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:49ff:fecb:ee62/64 Scope:Link
         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
         RX packets:21444 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
         TX packets:22860 errors:6 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
         RX bytes:12366318 (11.7 Mb)  TX bytes:3224575 (3.0 Mb)

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
         inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
         inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
         UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
         RX packets:80 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
         TX packets:80 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
         collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
         RX bytes:4796 (4.6 Kb)  TX bytes:4796 (4.6 Kb)

 

iwconfig shows

 

eth1      IEEE 802.11g  ESSID:"Ragga"  Nickname:"redhat1"
         Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.462GHz  Access Point: 00:C0:49:DA:AB:80
         Bit Rate=48Mb/s   Tx-Power=10 dBm
         RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
         Encryption key:xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xx
         Power Management:off
         Link Quality:38/94  Signal level:-50 dBm  Noise level:-154 dBm
         Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
         Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated..

 

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply. Linuxant actually don't charge for my chipset :D (Ti) but I take your point. dmesg shows nothing of relevance. Strange thing is that if I replace the hd with a xp image on it, I have no problems. Do you know of any differences between 10 & 10.1 with regards to network protocols (i was think about IPv6.. but not to clued up)?

 

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply. For now I think its been fixed (I hope!) I after nearly giving up decided to check the AP's website (www.usr.com) for any firmware updates & noticed some beta updates. With nothing to lose & a story shortened the network seems to be stable. I will leave this PC running for a couple of days & take it from there.

 

Thanks again for your interest peeps..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...