sitor Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 Hello, I am trying for the moment to install avidemux-2.0.16-1plf.i586. However I'm stuck with the following error: Sorry the following packages can't be selected: avidemux-2.0.16-1plf.i586 (due to unsatisfied libxvidcore.so.2) Thinking that this would help, I already created a symlink libxvidcore.so.2 to libxvidcore.so.4. However no luck. I googled on the error, but no usefull results. Anyone who can help me out here? Thanks in advance, Sitor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoopy Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 What I do is look up this file @ rpmfind.net to see what package it belongs to. Looking up libxvidcore.so.2 tells me it belongs to xvidcore-0.9.2-0.1.rh80.fr.i386.rpm --- but this aint' gonna do for us in MDK land. So in this case, seeing the program you want to install belongs to PLF, I would add PLF's source to your "media sources" and then use urpmi to install. You can use this to help you add sources: http://urpmi.org/easyurpmi/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 what does urpmf libxvidcore.so say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted March 31, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 Scoopy, I do have already PLF as a urpmi source. That is why this is so annoying. In principle I should have all required packages. bvc, [root@localhost wim]# urpmf libxvidcore.so libxvid4:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.4 libxvid4:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.4.0 libxvid4-devel:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so libxvidcore3:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.3 libxvidcore3:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.3.0 libxvidcore3-devel:/usr/lib/libxvidcore.so So he does not recognize the symlink I created. It is indeed present in the same place though: [root@localhost wim]# ls /usr/lib/libxvid* /usr/lib/libxvidcore.a* /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.3@ /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so@ /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.3.0* /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.2@ /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.4@ /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.2.0@ /usr/lib/libxvidcore.so.4.0* I will try to make a copy instead of a symlink. Maybe then it will get recognized? Let's find out! Ciao, Sitor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted March 31, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 I did try with the copy instead of the symlink and it gives exactly the same result. The libxvidcore.so.2 is still not recognized. What next? Anyone who has suggestions? Sitor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 get a newer avidemux to match the libxvidcore.so.4 you do have in your sources. What does urpmf avidemux say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted March 31, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 [wim@localhost wim]$ urpmf avidemux gstreamer-avi:/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.6/libgstavidemux.so gstreamer-avi:/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.6/libgstavidemux.so avidemux:/usr/bin/avidemux2 avidemux:/usr/lib/menu/avidemux avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16 avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/AUTHORS avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/COPYING avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/History avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/INSTALL avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/README avidemux:/usr/share/doc/avidemux-2.0.16/TODO avidemux:/usr/share/icons/avidemux.png avidemux:/usr/share/icons/large/avidemux.png avidemux:/usr/share/icons/mini/avidemux.png avidemux:/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/avidemux.mo avidemux:/usr/share/locale/klingon/LC_MESSAGES/avidemux.mo gstreamer-avi:/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.6/libgstavidemux.so What do you mean by getting a newer avidemux? Compiling from source? I just tried to install DVDTitler from source. Wow man, will take some time before I try something like that again. Once you solve one problem, there is another. If that is what you mean, I fear I will need someone to hold my hand. In the past I had similar probs with shared library versions not being present. Up till now, creating a symlink always worked. Any idea why it does not this time? Anyone a suggestion on how to get this solved? Ciao, Sitor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 well, there's this http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/conectiva/sn...294cl.i386.html another option is, if it's not already in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms, download it and install it with rpm -ivh --nodeps avidemux-2.0.16-1plf.i586 and see if it works. The more you get pkgs from too many different places the more dep problems you'll find yourself running into in the future. I always --nodeps a pkg from plf b4 trying a red hat or other distro pkg. The worst that'll happen is that it doesn't work. Unistall it and try another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 hmmm, I just got home and on mandrake and get the same results with urpmf as you do. Yes, I have plf as a source as well. They really should fix that dep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted April 1, 2004 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2004 Just send a mail to a PLF mailing list. I hope that is the right way to do it. We'll see what that gives. And I can try of course to install it with the nodeps, but I prefer not to (to keep things clean). In any case, already a big thanks for all the help. Ciao, Sitor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted April 14, 2004 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Hello guys, For all those with the same problem, here is a copy of my latest mail on the plf mailing list regarding the issue. Just to keep you informed. Seems like not a real serious problem, so I guess it will not take too long before it gets fixed. Götz, Unfortunately, this does not seem to work for me. I have tested different sources, and always get the same result as before. It seems the libxvid2 package is not on the mirrors (yet?): # urpmi libxvid2 no package named libxvid2 This was after changing (and thus updating source). I tried to use the zarb source (as I guess this is the original that is mirrored), but there I get this result: # urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/ 10.0 with hdlist.cz added medium plf examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD 1 (x86 ) (cdrom1).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD 3 (x86 ) (cdrom3).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD 4 (x86 ) (cdrom4).cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD 2.cz] retrieving source hdlist (or synthesis) of "plf"... ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10.0/hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10...hesis.hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/ba...hesis.hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/sy...hesis.hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/ba...esis.hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/ba...esis.hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/sy...esis.hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/sy...esis.hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10...esis.hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10...esis.hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10.0/hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/base/hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/hdlist.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/base/hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to base ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (13) Given file does not exist ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10.0/hdlist1.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 ftp://knight.zarb.org/pub/plf/mandrake/10.0/hdlist2.cz ...retrieving failed: curl: (9) Couldn't cd to 10.0 retrieval of source hdlist (or synthesis) failed no hdlist file found for medium "plf" examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz] problem reading synthesis file of medium "plf" unable to update medium "plf" I read somewhere that normal users would not get access anymore directly to this source, because of overload problems, so I guess that is the reason. Otherwise the Easy URPMI gives wrong reference to the hdlist location. Ciao, Sitor On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 08:07, Goetz Waschk wrote: > Am Di 13 Apr 2004 21:02:41 GMT schrieb Sitor: > > To come to the core of the message: I'm having a dependency problem with > > avidemux-2.0.16-1plf.i586, and I seem not to be the only one: > > Sorry the following packages can't be selected: > > avidemux-2.0.16-1plf.i586 (due to unsatisfied libxvidcore.so.2) > > Hi, > > libxvid2 was removed from the server by accident, I've reuploaded the > libxvid2 package, so this should work again. > > CU, Götz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sitor Posted April 14, 2004 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Yes! Open Source is great! Speak and you will be heard. In this case not by God but by Götz: Thanks Gôtz. The club-internet.fr does the trick indeed. I was finallyable to install avidemux. What will the new avidemux package bring? Will all apps depending on avidemux still work with it? Ciao, Sitor On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 15:27, Goetz Waschk wrote: > Am Mi 14 Apr 2004 15:23:53 GMT schrieb Sitor: > > Unfortunately, this does not seem to work for me. > > I have tested different sources, and always get the same result as > > before. It seems the libxvid2 package is not on the mirrors (yet?): > > club-internet.fr has libxvid2, but you can also wait for the new > avidemux package which uses libxvid4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.