Jump to content

Lowe

Members
  • Content Count

    416
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Lowe

  • Rank
    o.O

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://xuse.no-ip.info:8080/
  • ICQ
    0
  1. Thought it might be. As for the menu editor it wasn't in my menus either but the command is "gmenu-simple-editor". Thanks, I'll add that to xorg.conf later when I can be bothered :P . Mmm i'm liking the openbox + gnome combo even more, having a right click menu is all gnome was missing and now I have it!
  2. Question time Mr bvc. Why do most themes not seem to work in gnome 2.12? Or is this an archlinux specific bug. Also why does the new gnome menu editor not able to add items or is this also an archlinux specific bug? I'm getting used to gnomes slowness, although I did make gnome use openbox instead and it's a little faster. I still can't believe cairo slowed it down this much...
  3. Yeah... It's like running 16 instances of azureus. I thought it was just buggy when I tried the beta, but now the final is here and it's still slow as hell I'll be sticking to openbox from now on.
  4. Sure is, it's just bvc thinks he's always right. :P Anyway i'll be using kde until the new gnome is stable. Click to enlarge!
  5. http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/contr...2.70-1_i386.deb
  6. Yes that's correct, however since I use arch they bundle them all together so you get a lot of useless stuff you don't need, since it has less package maintainers it would take longer to split the packages or so they say anyway. err.... a browser w/o an addressbar... :huh: ...that's brilliant Oh... well, good thing you can change it with gconf-editor What is the point of that I wonder? Heh, you got the treeview to the left, so why would you need another above? Sheds more light on why it has taken 4 years to get nautilus functional. Such wasted time on useless code! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, tree view is kinda annoying the new way feels a lot cleaner.
  7. I don't use vlc anymore either, switched to kaffeine since it plays more formats than vlc and I just like it's "feel". Subtitles still suck, but xine always had messed up subtitles i could probably live with it. Unless someone knows a way to make them not suck. link removed by mystified - violation of Posting Guideline 2.2 This only happens with softsubs(I think that's whats it called anyway) and sadly all the softsubs I have are hentais so look at the screenshot at your own risk. It might not look like much but I cant seem to find how to change it, I want the subtitles more spread out and I want a nicer looking font I can't find the option in kaffeine and I tried changing stuff in the ~/.xine but it has no effect.
  8. Right, I understand everyone is allowed to express their opinions, I still don't see why scarecrow had to compare nero linux and k3b when the topic creator never asked that. I'm not being nasty either, I just simply don't want to be pushed away from the community like last time, just because an admin doesn't like my opinion.
  9. Been meaning to crack down on this, but was too tired to post earlier. Right, you may think what scarecrow wrote was perfectly acceptable and that's fine, however I don't because scarecrow wasn't expressing his opinion instead he was comparing it with other programs, the topic creator did NOT ask that he simply asked what people thought about nero linux. < who really cares, the topic creator obviously isn't intrested in that so why does scarecrow need to bring it up here? Couldn't he just keep it to himself? Hmm to be honest I think this is more a case of if you don't agree with the admins leave, well no such luck because i won't be leaving, like it or not.
  10. I used to use KDE when I used mandrake 10.0 and to be perfectly blunt, it was unstable as hell compared to gnome. Now I use archlinux and just recently started using KDE(3.4.2) again (was a long time gnome user)and it's a lot more stable than it used to be, only problem i've had so far is when adding stuff to the menu, but except that i've had no crashes or any funny buisness so far so i'm quite impressed. Still, I wouldn't say kde was more or less stable than gnome, they're both pretty solid these days.
  11. Got bored of that rather quickly. Decided to give KDE a proper try, it's still bloated as ever and it's gay how you need to install the full kdegraphics package just to get ksnapshot. It's kinda grown on me though, it's certianly a lot faster than it used to be. I used to hate konqueror aswell, but I like it now too it's a lot better performance wise than firefox. Firefox alsways used a hell of a lot cpu and made my music jump sometimes when I had a lot of tabs open. Oh ya.
  12. I've been playing with the upcoming gnome and err it's buggy as hell but I guess that's to be expected. http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/6383/screenshot14ns.png If you look at totem the windows don't seem to go away, it's like this with some of the other gnome apps aswell but for the most part I really like what they did to nautilus it's a lot easier to browse files with now. It's feeling REALLY unresponsive and locks up sometimes, hopefully that will all be fixed when it's released.
  13. I suggest you read the thread creators post again, he didn't ask if there was better programs, he asked for everyones opinion on nero linux what does that have to do with k3b? Stop shoving your opinion down peoples throats. Also if you actually read his post, he wanted nero because he used it a lot in windows and it helps to have programs the same/similiar. of course now i'm completely off topic, but whatever it needed to be said.
  14. I'm not that bored. :lol: Anyway, I wouldn't even know where to start.
  15. Went back to xfce. It's really boring, but I get things done quickly in xfce. http://xs42.xs.to/pics/05336/screenshot.png
×
×
  • Create New...