Jump to content

RH9/gnome 2.3.3 -apt/synaptic and NyQuist/DAG rpms


Recommended Posts

Oh, one more question :wink: 

 

cat /proc/cpuinfo shows my 1900+ cpu to be at 1600 even though I have it at 1900 in the bios, and /var/log/messages shows the same. Do you know how to tell the kernel to use it at 1900? Thanks!

 

[root@localhost /home]# cat /proc/cpuinfo<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->processor       : 0<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->cpu family      : 6<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->model           : 6<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->stepping        : 2<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->cpu MHz         : 1600.730<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->cache size      : 256 KB<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->fdiv_bug        : no<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->hlt_bug         : no<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->f00f_bug        : no<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->coma_bug        : no<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->fpu             : yes<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->fpu_exception   : yes<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->cpuid level     : 1<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->wp              : yes<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->bogomips        : 3191.60

 

var /log/messages

Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Initializing CPU#0<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Detected 1600.730 MHz processor.<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x25<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost keytable: Loading keymap: <!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 3191.60 BogoMIPS<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Memory: 252940k/262080k available (1347k kernel code, 6708k reserved, 999k data, 132k init, 0k highmem)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Buffer-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Page-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: CPU: L2 Cache: 256K (64 bytes/line)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Intel machine check architecture supported.<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ stepping 02<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEBegin-->Jul  6 10:20:12 localhost kernel: Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.

 

Here is mine,

 

morpheus:/home/justin # cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor       : 0

vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD

cpu family      : 6

model           : 8

model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+

stepping        : 0

cpu MHz         : 1659.642

cache size      : 256 KB

fdiv_bug        : no

hlt_bug         : no

f00f_bug        : no

coma_bug        : no

fpu             : yes

fpu_exception   : yes

cpuid level     : 1

wp              : yes

flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow

bogomips        : 3316.12

 

As you can see, AMD uses a different thought process than Intel?? AFAIK, AMD says that for example there XP 2000 would run side-by-side with a Intel 2.0Ghz even though it is rated at: cpu MHz : 1659.642

 

I'm really not sure on all of that, or if there just playing a numbers game! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I'm lovin' it! I'm not use to so many bios options. There doesn't seem to be 1 NoPNPOS settitng, but it seems you have to set all the options individually to BIOS. Does that sound right? It's Phoenix Award.

 

What error/s are you getting with nvidia? Are you rebuilding? A gcc compiler error? If so,

export IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=true

will get you through it.

 

....and yes, I just might play with the 2.5 and see how it's comming along. I tried it 8-12 mths ago when it was rather young and it was too unstable.

 

I was thinking of giving ML9.1 another shot but I can't even get the mouse going :shock: It's this usb2 crap, which BTW rh9 doesn't have a prob with I guess because it's not in the kernel. I disabled usb2 in the bios and still can't get the Logitech Mouseman Optical Cordless USB mouse to work in ML9.1. So I'm hesitant to even try the install just to have to compile usb2 out of the kernel, if that is what is necessary and would even work. AARRGGGHHH!!!!! I feel like I'm starting over......AGAIN! :twisted: 

 

Get this......the via82cxxx_audio/AC97 works in the default rh9 gnome2.2 but hangs everything in my unstable rh9 with gnome2.3.3. I haven't looked too much into this yet as far as module.conf entries etc....

 

I will have to try that when I get my RH system backup.

export IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=true

 

I was playing with SuSE, and the latest RH9 Kernel started to give me some crazy fast FPS using glxgears, I'm talking FPS 18,000+

 

Everyone else from Gentoo, Slack, Lib, SuSE & the rest of the gang I would range from 2500-4500. I still can't believe it, but I've seen it with my own eyes! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize it was intel and my celeron 600 was shown as a

model name :Intel Celeron Coppermine 600

cpu MHz : 598.something

 

and when I overclocked it with cpufsb in win98 @ 750, linux showed

model name :Intel Celeron Coppermine 750

cpu MHz : 744.something

 

So if I had a celeron 800 would it have shown about 780? or something? See what I mean the numbers are going down, but could be a overclock/multiplier issue....I don't know. I'll look into it and try and find out because I didn't go through all this and spend the bucks to be ripped off 300MHz :P Besides, other post show users overclocking, though they never post the output of cpuinfo :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...