SCO vs Groklaw's Pamela Jones

[spinynorman]

SCO tried last week to serve a subpoena to Jones at a house in Darien, Conn., where they believe she's been living, but the attempt was unsuccessful, according to a person close to the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

 

On Saturday, she posted an item on her "Groklaw" blog telling readers that she would be taking a "health break" for an unspecified amount of time.

 

Full story at www.forbes.com.

[Darkelve]

Several curse words for SCO come to mind... to stoop so low.

[tyme]

Previously she had a reporter track her down and publish facts about her, violating her choice to remain anonymous in her work. SCO was likely a driving force behind that one too. It's sad to see someone who just tries to report and explain the information to allow the public to be informed (that is, being a real journalist) be strong-armed by a corrupt company.

[Gowator]

Previously she had a reporter track her down and publish facts about her, violating her choice to remain anonymous in her work. SCO was likely a driving force behind that one too. It's sad to see someone who just tries to report and explain the information to allow the public to be informed (that is, being a real journalist) be strong-armed by a corrupt company.

I agree, even the reporter who say's she has accused of being pro-SCO seems to be able to find some sympathy for her (or perhaps him)...

 

The whole SCO issue is an illustration of the way the legal process can be messed with....

I and I think everyone else would like to see some evidence not just wild claims....

 

If SCO wants to make claims it should at least publish the offending lines of linux code it beleives infringe...rather more fairly it should then publish what it beleives it to infringe upon... but even the former would be a step in the right direction.