Peep Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 I just did a clean install of the download edition of 9.2 and things seem to be going smoothly, but this just looks weird to me: [bill@localhost bill]$ df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7 5.0G 1.1G 3.9G 22% / /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8 8.4G 232M 8.2G 3% /home /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 2.6G 4.0K 2.6G 1% /mnt/windows why doesn't it say "hda7" and "hda8" etc? is this a problem, and if so, how do i fix it? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainierPeak Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 Just wanted to confirm that I have the same, weird issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peep Posted December 30, 2003 Author Share Posted December 30, 2003 ok, thanks. i probably won't worry about it so much then :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roland Posted December 30, 2003 Share Posted December 30, 2003 /dev/hdx are links. They point to things like /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/partx roland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris z Posted December 31, 2003 Share Posted December 31, 2003 i have the same problem/nuisance after upgrading to MDK9.2. after searching a bit, i found the following info. this is a known bug with MDK9.2 & the 2.4.xx kernel. see this BUG REPORT . excerpts from above link: Inside "software" forum, bgmline has posted in the "9.2 changes the way df and mount report mounted device names" a nice example of the problems created by this bug. The simple script: df |awk '{print $6}' works in 9,1, but fails in 9.2, because long devfs-style names cause the output to appear on two lines insterad of one. note that the kernel-2.6.x was fixed for this problem. maybe the fix is simple enough to be backported ? there is a ham handed fix listed that involves editing lilo if ya wanna do it. if it is indeed fixed with the 2.6 kernel, then i'll just deal with it until i can get an rpm of that kernel that works or until (perhaps) a patch is released for the 2.4 kernel. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now