Jump to content

mdemers883

Members
  • Posts

    215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mdemers883

  1. well, I might as well jump in on this thread since it pretty much pertains to a question I was about to ask. I was wondering about upgrading to gnome 2.8 but since it's still in cooker and could mess up my system I think I should hold off till I'm more comfortable with linux. I'm guessing getting gnome 2.6 should be no problem though. I'm guessing I could do this through urpmi (not sure, I just started using urpmi yesterday) and if so what would be the command. Wlould a simple

    urpmi gnome

    work or would

    urpmi upgrade gnome

    Sorry if my question seems obvious, I"m still learning :P

  2. so I would use

     

    ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Li.../Mandrake/RPMS2

    for updates

     

    ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Li.../Mandrake/RPMS3

    for main

     

    ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Li....0/contrib/RPMS

    for contrib

     

    correct?

     

    also my "speed" is between 4000-5000 while downloading...I"m hoping that doesn't mean 4k-5kbps

  3. I"m using the mcc media manager as we speak and I"m updating the contrib to one that you listed...is it normal or it to take about an hour to download hdlist2.cz?

  4. oops, sorry pmpatrick, I should've mentioned that I"m using gnome (the version that comes with mandy 10 ) I've tried right clickiing on the desktop but to no avail for adding it. I can navigate to /mnt/windows via epifany. Any ideas on how to get it mounted on my desktop in gnome?

  5. hmmmm, I have a ATI 9500 seriers onboard. I"m guessing my plain ol "Radeon" setting XFdrake may not be cutting it. I checked the list further and the closest thing I saw was a 8500 series. I'm not sure if I"m on the right track or not, if I am I have no clue what to do from here :lol:

  6. WEll, I went to XFdrake and did some configuring:

    for graphics card it's showing ATI radeon

     

    Monitor: custom

     

    Resolution: 1152x864 24bpp

     

    I'm not sure if those settings are perfect but I think they are probably right ( I have ATI)

     

    here is a screenshot, look how huge gaim is :(

    post-2215-1096591091_thumb.jpg

  7. ok, I went to this site to get my urpmi up and running. I used the Pennsylvania mirrors since a couple of the others were getting curl errors. So, it looks lI got the urpmi installed correctly. I updated it as well. So, I can download packages and such...I just grabbed firefox, and it grabbed version 0.8 so needless to say it's grabbing OLD stuff. Here is my urpmi.cfg

     

    plf ftp://ftp.free.fr/pub/Distributions_Linux/plf/mandrake/11.0 {
     hdlist: hdlist.plf.cz
     with_hdlist: hdlist.cz
     list: list.plf
     key-ids: caba22ae
    }
                                                                                                                                
    updates ftp://carroll.cac.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.0/RPMS {
     hdlist: hdlist.updates.cz
     with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist.cz
     list: list.updates
     key-ids: 22458a98
     update
    }
                                                                                                                                
    main ftp://carroll.cac.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions/mandrakelinux/official/10.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS {
     hdlist: hdlist.main.cz
     with_hdlist: ../base/hdlist.cz
     key-ids: 70771ff3
    }
                                                                                                                                
    contrib ftp://carroll.cac.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions/mandrakelinux/official/10.0/contrib/i586 {
     hdlist: hdlist.contrib.cz
     with_hdlist: ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz
     key-ids: 78d019f5
    }

     

    Not sure if you guys can see what is wrong. Anyone have any ideas of what's wrong, I know it's obviously an error on my part I just have no clue what I have wrong.

     

    :thanks:

  8. ok, I can't seem to get my 2nd hdd (hdb1) which is ntfs mounted on my desktop. I keep all my music files on that drive. Here is my current /etc/fstab

     

    /dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
    none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
    /dev/hda6 /home reiserfs notail 1 2
    none    /mnt/cdrom      supermount      fs=udf:iso9660,dev=/dev/hdc,--,codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,ro,umask=0,nodev,exec 0 0
    none    /mnt/cdrom2     supermount      fs=udf:iso9660,dev=/dev/hdd,--,codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,ro,umask=0,nodev,exec 0 0
    none /mnt/floppy supermount dev=/dev/fd0,fs=ext2:vfat,--,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,sync,codepage=850 0 0
    /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows ntfs umask=0,defaults 0 0
    none /proc proc defaults 0 0
    /dev/hda5 swap swap defaults 0 0

     

    I have supermount enabled. But, I also tried manually mounting the drive:

     

    [root@localhost mark]# mount -t ntfs /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows
    mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /mnt/windows busy
    mount: according to mtab, /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1 is already mounted on /mnt/windows
    [root@localhost mark]#

     

    I'm not sure if my fstab is misconfigured or what I"m doing wrong. Any help will be appreciated.

  9. Well, I see some ppl have repsonded to this thread since I've read it last :P Well, some updates on what I've been up to. I've been using SuSE 9.0 and 9.1 since and it automatically detects my sis900 and my connection works right away. I liked suse, but I thought it was lacking in rpms. I've been toying with fedora core3 test2 the past couple of days...I'm not quite sure if I like it or not yet, lol. I had briefly installed mandrake 10.0 but my sis900 still didn't work :( ...but, I'm debating on installing it tonight with the plug and play OS turned OFF and disabling the acpi. Since my fedora install is fresh it's not like I'd be losing anything important.

  10. uhh.... is your eth0 recognized by the installer? if not, please give us a hint, what kernel you are running for this. also... if i were you, i would wait till sarge gets "rereleased". they are about to ship the next stable-debian version in some weeks as far as i know.

     

    was there/is htere anything tha tyou did to get around it? if so, please let me know :thanks:

  11. Well, I"m a semi-linux newbie and I have never used Debian, I've heard great things about it and I've yet to try it. I've used SuSE, Mandrake, and Red Hat in the past but would like to try debian out due to the port system. I read an article on the Debian-Installer release candidate 1 and it looked very straight foward and seemed to be a great installer. I downloaded it (around 114mb I think) and once the installer was launched I wanted to download the packages via FTP. I have an onboard ethernet connection ( SiS 900 to be exact) but, for some reason my dhcp isn't detected. I have bellsouth fast access dsl connection, so that means it's pppoe. Sorry if this sounds very obvious, but, do you guys know how I would go about getting this to work? Thank you for any help that you can give me, and if you need any more info please ask.

  12. here is the output of lsmod:

     

    [root@localhost mark]# lsmod
    Module                  Size  Used by
    sg                     41020  0
    sr_mod                 18724  0
    radeon                137632  20
    snd-seq-oss            36480  0
    snd-seq-midi-event      8768  1 snd-seq-oss
    snd-seq                58768  4 snd-seq-oss,snd-seq-midi-event
    snd-intel8x0           36040  0
    gameport                5696  1 snd-intel8x0
    snd-mpu401-uart         8800  1 snd-intel8x0
    snd-pcm-oss            55716  0
    snd-mixer-oss          20608  1 snd-pcm-oss
    snd-emu10k1           101028  0
    snd-rawmidi            25984  2 snd-mpu401-uart,snd-emu10k1
    snd-pcm               103488  3 snd-intel8x0,snd-pcm-oss,snd-emu10k1
    snd-timer              27748  2 snd-seq,snd-pcm
    snd-seq-device          9256  4 snd-seq-oss,snd-seq,snd-emu10k1,snd-rawmidi
    snd-ac97-codec         64740  2 snd-intel8x0,snd-emu10k1
    snd-page-alloc         13508  3 snd-intel8x0,snd-emu10k1,snd-pcm
    snd-util-mem            5536  1 snd-emu10k1
    snd-hwdep              10368  1 snd-emu10k1
    snd                    57636  15 snd-seq-oss,snd-seq-midi-event,snd-seq,snd-intel8x0,snd-mpu401-uart,snd-pcm-oss,snd-mixer-oss,snd-emu10k1,snd-rawmidi,snd-pcm,snd-timer,snd-seq-device,snd-ac97-codec,snd-util-mem,snd-hwdep
    soundcore              10976  1 snd
    af_packet              23336  0
    hid                    57728  0
    ide-floppy             20864  0
    ide-tape               39184  0
    ide-cd                 43876  0
    cdrom                  40640  2 sr_mod,ide-cd
    floppy                 63220  0
    sis900                 21732  0
    nls_iso8859-1           4896  2
    ntfs                   91660  2
    supermount             41712  1
    reiserfs              269652  1
    sis-agp                 6688  1
    agpgart                33996  2 sis-agp
    ppa                    13512  0
    parport_pc             36064  0
    imm                    13928  0
    scsi_mod              122384  4 sg,sr_mod,ppa,imm
    parport                43688  3 ppa,parport_pc,imm
    ehci-hcd               26916  0
    ohci-hcd               20740  0
    usbcore               108860  5 hid,ehci-hcd,ohci-hcd
    rtc                    14056  0
    ext3                  122600  1
    jbd                    66168  1 ext3

  13. Well, anybody that has seen my previous mandrake threads knows that I've never been able to get my SiS900 onboard ethernet to work with mandrake. I tried in 9.1 and 9.2 but with little success.

     

    Recently I've been using SuSE9.0 with no problems, was running smoothly. I"m still a linux noob, but I'm better than I used to be. So I was a bit bored today and already had the mandrake 10 ISO's downloaded so I figured I might as well give it a try.

     

    Eth0 failed on boot (always happens to me :lol: ) So I think configured it in harddrake. After restarting the network and restarting X it still wouldn't work. So, now I have to ask you guys for help...as usual ;)

     

    Here is the output of lspci:

     

    [mark@localhost mark]$ lspci
    00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS 645xx (rev 03)
    00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS 530 Virtual PCI-to-PCI                    bridge (AGP)
    00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]: Unknown device 0963 (rev 2                   5)
    00:02.1 SMBus: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]: Unknown device 0016
    00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE]
    00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Sound Cont                   roller (rev a0)
    00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev                    0f)
    00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev                    0f)
    00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0 Controller
    00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 10/100 Ethe                   rnet (rev 91)
    00:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 08)
    00:0b.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 08)
    01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY [Radeon                    7000/VE]

     

    If I remember correctly I'm running the new 2.6 kernel. Any ideas of how I should approach getting my connection to work? As always, any help is appreciated.

     

    Mark

  14. Although I"m a linux newbie (glad to be one) here is how I view the situation:

     

    If you are happy with a mediocre product, not having total control of your system, viruses, more holes than swiss cheese, and a resource hog then stick with windoz.

     

    If you like having total control of your system, not having your choices limited, having a plethora of software to choose from, and stability then stick with linux.

     

    I've always been a windows user, and granted I'm still much faster/efficient with windoz than I am with linux I still prefer linux. I enjoy tweaking it and breaking it, the more I do that the more I learn and the more fun I have. Linux definately isn't for everybody, but I'm definately glad I'm making my effort to be better with linux than I am with windoz.

     

     

    Mark

×
×
  • Create New...