Jump to content

iphitus

Global Moderator
  • Posts

    3831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by iphitus

  1. I am not sure either. Under linux, KNetworkManager would simply not connect and eventually time-out.

     

    which could just be a misconfiguration on your end. Access points dont do "os detection" at an association level, and 802.11 association is a standard well implemented under linux.

     

    James

  2. Welcome to the board draker!

     

    Mandriva ought to include madwifi, but if it doesnt, you can install it with dkms. I don't know the exact command, but im sure someone will come here soon and show you.

     

    There's no need for ndiswrapper here, as madwifi is an excellent and stable driver, so hopefully nobody suggests that.

     

    James

  3. The issue here is that mandriva comes with newer versions of a range of libraries, including GLIBC.

     

    Maple is linked against older versions, intended to be installed on distros with those versions. It's probably got a list of "supported" distros, like RHEL, SuSE, and others. Maple's primary audience is more likely to use these stable "production" distros.

     

    Symlinking will not work (except in the most simple of cases, this does not include glibc). Do not install an old glibc over your current one, it'll effectively break your system.

     

    If you want it working on mandriva, either:

    - find a statically compiled version of maple or one that includes the libs

    - get a newer version, if one exists.

    - install compatibility libs. thats what the novell solution details to an extent.

     

    Before you do any of that, remove the symlinks, they'll just get in the way.

     

    James

  4. It provides another option to the user. It'd help keep it lightweight. And no, no security issues. Not if it's done right.

     

    Security isn't that simple, otherwise all the major projects would never be releasing patches and security updates.

     

    As for "lightweight" -- a web browser (firefox anyone?), web server, processes for dynamic pages (php/python/ruby/perl/etc)... isnt lightweight. It's overkill. Feature Creep.

     

    Nor can i think of any usage situation where this thing would actually be useful. It'd be slower, have a much weaker UI, and be far less capable. It'd be far more complex, heavier on the system, and putting something in a browser that doesnt need to be, gaining nothing extra by being there.

     

    James

  5. I have this one myself, a great introduction to the kernel and how it operates. From this you could start messing around, and then delve into something a bit more complicated.

     

    http://www.amazon.com/Linux-Kernel-Develop...s/dp/0672327201

     

    After that, there's the in kernel Documentation/, linux device drivers (3rd Ed) - available free online too, and probably other books I don't know.

     

    Careful buying books, that you get the latest edition, otherwise you'll end up with a useless book about Kernel 2.4. Things have changed a *lot* since then, so don't even consider old editions.

     

    James

  6. But the regular GUI remains?

    Anyway browser based package managing doesn't make too much sense to me. I certainly wouldn't use it. I don't even know who would prefer it over the regular GUI.

     

    and adds a pile of security issues.

     

    James

  7. I honestly don't think you can put FreeBSD above Linux and Mac as a desktop replacement. Besides, the article would've been pretty much the same for FBSD as it was for Linux, so why bother to write them both up?

     

    When it comes to open source desktop systems, Ubuntu is by far the best for n00bs, imho.

     

    I was being a tad sarcastic :)

  8. thecompletecomputerresource or thelongesturliveseenforalongtime.com? :P

     

    Follow the gnome hig. Don't follow everything exactly if you don't want, but it's got plenty of smart suggestions on how to construct UI's and keep them consistent.

     

    http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/

     

    what sticks out to me in the screenies:

    * no spacing whatsoever. cramped!

    * Icons go on buttons, not menu items. What's that find thing on the menu? Make it a button and move it to the toolbar.

    * Usually toolbar buttons have larger icons

    * Use GTK stock icons only.

    * Buttons on tabs??

     

    And the other thing. it's fun to plan the UI, but it's even better to write the code. Before you've even designed the UI you know how the program's going to work and what many of the routines will be. I've seen lots of projects dead in the water, and they've only ever designed the UI.

     

    James

  9. The Inquirer is, imho, the worst news disseminator on the Internet. Their website is ugly and their news is not fact checked, makes blind, sweeping statements and they just generally suck. If the Inquirer says something, the opposite is usually true.

     

    The post triggered deja'vu, so i searched up to find some articles, so while the inquirer may not be the best, i do remember it being reported elsewhere.

     

    smh is a reliable resource, the better newspaper here :)

     

    James

  10. linus' argument lacks logic and is ridiculously short sighted.

     

    Con always made an effort to chase up bugs, even the most obscure bugs. I admired his patience. The one "bug" that Linus saw, Con did chase up, and the scheduler was not at fault. The user who was reporting it refused to accept this, and it caused a bit of a stink on the mailing list. Linus' argument is based on this one single report. If he'd bothered to look on the CK mailing list, or at any other work of Con's, he'd have seen diligent and careful bug handling.

     

    Additionally, Con stopped developing *after* it was clear that SD had no future in mainstream. So saying that he is not capable of being a long term maintainer is based on something that developed *after* Con's SD was rejected, and could not have been part of Linus' original decision. Regardless, would Con bother maintaining SD if it was going to be seen by most as "second place". Con is more than capable of long term maintenance, as shown by his continual improvement and maintenance of his staircase scheduler, and swap prefetch for many years.

     

    This saga and many others, have shown some pretty nasty flaws in how the kernel is developed. Ugh.

     

    James

  11. I've been following the trends in the last few weeks. It's sad seeing CK quitting the kernel developers/hackers scene, but IMHO he exaggerates some points.

    The real point of his decision is rather personal, and aimed against one person: Ingo Molnar.

    There's no question that this guy is an obnoxious egotripper as well as a very average coder, but Linus seems trusting him... Oh well.

     

    Give him credit. His decision isn't just directed at Ingo, it's been something long in the making, before this whole spat.

     

    The current development style has some big problems, and they get in the way of things getting done. Con does exaggerate slightly, but mostly, he's correct.

     

    James

  12. Thanks for the Windows screenshot, however you'll find we use Linux here ;)

     

    If there is a Linux client for this, please provide it, else you'll find this will fall on dead ears.

     

    It's a firefox extention, thus it's cross platform. Or at least, I know this one is. There's also a tonne of metalink command line clients.

     

    No need to be so cold ianw :)

  13. slow down. don't try to do everything at once. first you're better off learning how an SCM works, before you go on complicating things and trying to share it.

     

    Most people are gradually moving away from CVS to other, and simpler alternatives. Subversion (svn) might well be better suited for you as you're looking at a centralised setup.

     

    A quick google finds these, which will give you a good introduction to scms and svn in particular:

    http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=408888&rl=1

    http://abbeyworkshop.com/howto/misc/svn01/

     

    James

  14. What's the kernel sound module? "lsmod|grep snd" should show this.

     

    Getting apps that interact with the sound card like that can be black magic under alsa. If it doesnt work with aoss, like some games, things get difficult.

     

    I find the easiest approach is to go the opposite way. Use OSS.

     

    http://www.opensound.com/

     

    That *was* a closed source implementation of OSS, but it was recently open sourced. The open source implementation OSS that exists in the kernel currently is deprecated, but OSS as a general sound system is not. It works great for me, and does a much better job of implementing mixing than alsa. It has an alsa compatibility, but most applications still have OSS support anyway. Install that (it has an rpm), enable it, set apps to OSS, and things should work a bit easier.

     

    James

  15. It's been going that way for years, but it's long been clear that it doesnt work. Macrovision and CSS (DVD), HDCP and AACS (bluray/hddvd). They've each been broken and proven flawed.

     

    DRM is a dead end. Each iteration will be broken, with the downside that it will somewhat inconvenience consumers for a short while.

     

    James

  16. jos: the reason we set the return procedure up the way we did is purely for reasons of speed: we figured if you returned the product to us, we returned it to dane-elec, they sent us a new one, then we sent ita on to you, that'd be a lot slower and more inefficient than you simply getting it straight from dane-elec. It wasn't intended to suggest that we don't accept ultimate responsibility for the problem you've encountered, of course that does lie with us.

     

    It definitely seems like this is not being handled properly, though, for which I can only apologize :(. I will get in touch with whoever I can to try and have your situation sorted out as a priority matter.

     

    but this isnt a good idea. as it is, it seems that people deal with dane elec and you can only hope that dane elec fix it.

     

    You've knocked people off your own support processes and onto another company's. In doing so, you should at least have some way of guaranteeing a reasonable level of support.

     

    Either route their queries through you, or try to hold dane-elec accountible in some way. Otherwise, why should dane-elec care about your customers? Mandriva will end up with the bad reputation, and dane-elec lose nothing.

     

    Mandriva really ought to start thinking about their customers once in a while...

     

    James

×
×
  • Create New...