Jump to content

repositories for apt-get: freshrpms vs fedora


null
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just read an article (current issue of Linux Format) about apt-get. They made it clear that freshrpm repositories and the new "fedora" repositories have agreed to use different versioning methods for their filenames. The article specifically said DO NOT mix freshrpms sites & fedora sites in your repository file (sources.list for redhat) or you will SCREW-UP your system good and you would be getting all sorts of errors and conflicts.

 

When they come up with something good (apt-get) why do they have to come along and screw it up... :? I can see articles coming about "apt-get hell"...

 

Needless to say, I made sure I don't have any fedora sites listed in my sources.list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D/k if you can use any info here...heh, I've never used pinning for apt so I d/k if apt-4-rpm can even make use of it, or it there's any thing else here that'll interest you. I started with Libranet and there's a lot of good info on the forum even 4 Debian'ers and apt'ers.

 

Forum

http://forum.libranet.com/index.php

 

Apt

http://forum.libranet.com/viewtopic.php?t=...ght=apt+pinning

http://forum.libranet.com/viewtopic.php?t=...ght=apt+pinning

http://forum.libranet.com/viewtopic.php?t=2357

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...