Jump to content

Installation of new FireGL drivers with radeon 9700


Guest chrismcdirty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest chrismcdirty

I get the following error when i unpack the rpm:

 

[root@localhost cmccurdy]# rpm -i --force fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.4.3.i586.rpm

*** Trying to install a precompiled kernel module.

*** WARNING ***

Tailored kernel module for fglrx not present in your system.

You must go to /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod subdir

and execute './make.sh' to build a fully customed kernel module.

Afterwards go to /lib/modules/fglrx and run './make_install.sh'

in order to install the module into your kernel's module repository.

(see readme.txt for more details.)



As of now you can still run your XServer in 2D, but hardware acclerated

OpenGL will not work and 2D grafics will lack performance.



failed.

*** Error: no kernel module build environment - please consult readme.

===

ATI display drivers successfully installed

please run 'fglrxconfig' now

===

 

So i go to /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod and run ./make.sh, which yields the following error:

 

[root@localhost build_mod]# ./make.sh

ATI module generator V 2.0

==========================

Error:

kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include do not match current kernel.

they are versioned as "2.4.18"

instead of "2.4.19-16mdk".

you might need to adjust your symlinks:

- /usr/include

- /usr/src/linux

 

When I logon to the computer, above the username, it says 2.4.19-16mdk, but the version.h it is polling says 2.4.18. It also results in '2.4.19-16mdk' when I run 'uname -r'.

Because of this problem, I have slow 2D acceleration and no 3D hardware acceleration. Does anybody know what's going on or what to do? Thank you for any help that you can give me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest marcelo

It looks weird to me... My installation worked perfectly.

 

The makefile used /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h which informed the correct version: 2.4.19-16mdk.

 

But I also found /usr/include/linux/kernel/version.h, which shows version 2.4.18 (???)

 

Doing a quick RPM check, I found out that the first one came (as presumed) from kernel-source-2.4.19-16mdk BUT the second one came from kernel-headers-2.4.18-41mdk.

 

Therefore, you should be able to compile the driver if kernel-source-2.4.19-16mdk is installed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...