mdg
-
Posts
242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by mdg
-
-
I recently moved to 10 OE and I'm having trouble with drive mounts. I can mount drives using eg
mount -t auto /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom
but it mounts read only
I understand that supermount doesn't work in 10 - so how can I automount my fstab entries at boot?
I'm getting errors at boot with this issue, namely:
mount: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1, or too many mounted file systems mount: mount: No medium found mount: mount: /dev/fd0 is not a valid block device
Also, /proc doesn't load at boot
My fstab
/dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,defaults 0 0 /dev/hdb1 / ext3 defaults 1 1 /dev/hdb5 /home ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hdb6 /usr ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hdb7 swap swap defaults 0 0 /dev/hda6 /mnt/92home ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hda5 /mnt/92root ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hda7 /mnt/92usr ext3 defaults 1 2 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0 /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto umask=0,user,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,ro 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto umask=0,user,iocharset=iso8859-1,sync,codepage=850 0 0
[moved from Software by spinynorman]
-
What command did you use to compile the src.rpm?
If I had downloaded the file to /home/downloads, for instance, I would cd to that directory, then su to root and put
rpmbuild --rebuild NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.src.rpm
Don't forget, case-sensitive
It seems from the error you gave that the name of the src rpm wasn't complete, unless you edited the error
-
If you're using the stock kernel with 9.2, you'll probably need to install the nvidia drivers. Click on the "Downloads" link at the top of the page and get the 0261 src.rpm.
You'll also need to get your kernel source. Type "uname -r" (no quotes) to see what kernel you are running and download the matching kernel source from http://www.kernel.org
Install the kernel source rpm first, then compile and install the nvidia src.rpm using
"rpmbuild --rebuild name-of-file.src.rpm" as root. That will build a rpm for you and put it in /usr/src/somewhere (I forget where exactly,I'm not on Linux right now). Near the end of the compilation there'll be a line telling you where the file went. Install the rpm
If all goes well, run Drakconnect, select the nvnet driver and you should have a working LAN
There's another thread on this here, which might give more details
-
7/10
I missed bogomips(?), the apache question and the window manager question (stupid, wasn't thinking)
-
I'm using a Microsoft Explorer, it's also a bus mouse on a PS/2 connection, like yours, only I'm still in 9.2
My XF86Config-4 entry has /dev/psaux, not /dev/mouse, maybe changing your entry around might make a difference
Having said that, I think Mdk 10 uses a different way of listing devices than 9.2 (something to do with udev?), so maybe it's meant to be /dev/mouse
Anyway, no harm trying, you can change back if it doesn't work
-
Right click on the taskbar then click Add - Applet - Pager
-
As for the bios message, I found an explanation at this address:
Why does the BIOS string say PII and not PIII ?This is the BIOS Base Support Message and is meant to say PII (It means that the BIOS will support the PII as well as PIII.
You should see the following line recognizes the PIII correctly
(See BIOS message)
Also, have a look at this site, there are a few questions and answers about your board. The first question is in Dutch, but it relates to adding a 80GB disk to this board and the disk not being recognized. Seems like the solution to all the problems is a bios upgrade
Of course, there's still the possibility that the CPU is dead...
-
Windows 3.1 up to XP
Linux distros I tried for varying lengths of time before going back to Mdk:
Lycoris
Redhat
Suse
Gentoo
Arch
Debian
Libranet
-
I built a new system a month ago and my research for that showed the importance of the power supply. The manufacturer is more important than the wattage. A good 300W will beat a mediocre 400W in quality of power and stability for your system.
Get a name brand (Antec, Enermax, Thermaltake etc). The Enermax 365 and 465 both have great reviews
-
Krusader is a two pane graphical file manager modelled on the ex windows commander. This is the forum, there's a download link there
-
I had similar problems with Mdk 9.2 and 2.6.2 kernel. Details in this thread.
Are you sure you have the right kernel sources installed? My problems disappeared when I used the 2.4 kernel with matching sources.
-
I deleted the file and rebooted - no "bringing up eth1" anymore. Thanks aru
-
aru, as requested:
[root:marc]# for file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth*; do echo $file; cat $file; done /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=dhcp IPADDR=192.168.2.101 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.2.0 BROADCAST=192.168.2.255 ONBOOT=yes MII_NOT_SUPPORTED=yes NEEDHOSTNAME=yes /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=dhcp NETMASK=255.255.255.0 ONBOOT=yes MII_NOT_SUPPORTED=yes NEEDHOSTNAME=yes
-
I didn't find the relevant part in dmesg, but it was in the boot.log:
Mar 2 12:58:13 mguise network: Setting network parameters: succeeded Mar 2 12:58:13 hostname network: Bringing up loopback interface: succeeded Mar 2 12:58:17 hostname network: Bringing up interface eth0: succeeded Mar 2 12:58:17 hostname network: Bringing up interface eth1: succeeded Mar 2 12:58:17 hostname internet: Checking internet connections to start at boot succeeded Mar 2 12:58:18 hostname portmap: portmap startup succeeded Mar 2 12:58:20 hostname ntpd: ntpd startup succeeded
-
I have a small home network set up as follows:
Cable modem connected to Edimax router via WAN port
Mdk 9.2 box connected to router (LAN port)
XP box connected to router (LAN port)
All IP's are handled by DHCP
Internet sharing works and file sharing works from Mdk only - I can browse XP dirs from Mdk box, but can't get into Mdk from XP (but that's not the issue right now)
When I bootup Mdk, it loads both eth0 and eth1. I only have one NIC on either machine, so what is eth1?
Here's the result of ifconfig
[root:marc]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:61:53:EC:B6 inet addr:192.168.2.101 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:74166 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:77247 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:92538833 (88.2 Mb) TX bytes:7197295 (6.8 Mb) Interrupt:11 Base address:0x1000 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:306 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:306 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:20474 (19.9 Kb) TX bytes:20474 (19.9 Kb)
And ifconfig eth1
[root:marc]# ifconfig eth1 eth1: error fetching interface information: Device not found
Bootup also takes a long time to bring up eth0 (eth1 is picked up immediately after)
Is eth1 maybe the router?
-
Check in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 if you have the "z-axis" line in the Input Device section. It should look like this:
Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection
I don't know how your mouse is set up, so don't copy the other lines unless you think they fit your config
-
Don't know how to do it myself, but this link might help
-
Thanks for the input, I think I'll leave it set up the way it was. The router has a firewall built in, so it should be reasonably secure
-
My home network setup right now is like this:
Setup 1:
Cable modem connected to router (WAN port)
LAN port 1(router) goes to Mdk box
LAN port 2 goes to XP box
Both machines can connect to internet, but I haven't figured out file sharing yet (that's for another post)
I'm wondering if it's not better to setup like this:
Setup 2:
Cable modem connects to Mdk box (eth0)
Mdk (eth1) goes to router (WAN port)
LAN port 1 (router) goes to XP box
My main objectives are internet sharing and file sharing
Any advantages of one method over the other?
-
1) 2.6 has a fully working nvidia lan driver
The nforce driver included in the 2.6 kernel is forcedeth, which would not work with my mboard. The driver in the nvidia src.rpm is nvnet, which did work. From reading other forums, I've seen that the forcedeth driver works only in a few cases. The majority of people using the nforce2 LAN are using the nvnet drivers
Raystorm, make sure you back up everything, like fissy suggested, you'll be using a lot of cooker packages to solve dependencies
-
I'll agree with arthurking - don't bother with 2.6 right now. Get it working with the 2.4 kernel and you can move up later.
I had the 2.6.2 kernel running when I tried to install nvidia's src.rpm and after three days of trying, I eventually broke my system by updating with cooker to install needed file versions and solving deps.
I reinstalled with 2.4.22 and after minimal effort got sound and LAN running with nforce drivers.
I'm also in no hurry to install the 2.6 kernel again
-
I installed glibc-devel-2.3.3-10mdk plus other dependencies.
If I look at bvc's output of urpmf irq.h, I can find all those files in the right places on my box, but if I do "urpmf irq.h" (or any other disputed file), I get no output.
Are these files somehow not in the path?
My whole point here is to get the onboard LAN to work, but it seems a lot simpler to me to just install a NIC and be done with it
-
I have glibc-devel-2.3.2-14mdk installed and 2.6.2-1mdk kernel running with kernel-source-2.6.2-1mdk installed
[root:marc]# rpm -q glibc-devel glibc-devel-2.3.2-14mdk [root:marc]# uname -r 2.6.2-1mdk [root:marc]# rpm -qa | grep kernel kernel-2.4.22.6mdk-1-1mdk kernel-doc-2.4.22-5mdk kernel-2.6.0.1mdk-1-1mdk kernel-2.6.2.1mdk-1-1mdk kernel-source-2.6.2-1mdk
nforce.src.rpm still won't work
-
If you're using KDE, go to Control Centre-peripherals-mouse select the Avanced tab and adjust the bottom option, "mouse wheel scrolls by..."
Format fails on nForce2 Mobo
in Installing Mandriva
Posted
If you downloaded your iso's, did you check md5sums before burning to cd? It's possible you have a bad download
The md5 sums will be at the site you downloaded from