Jump to content

zero0w

Members
  • Posts

    864
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zero0w

  1. This is what I cannot say for sure, literally, one can use "make uninstall" to clean things up when compiling/installing from source. But as ALSA is something rather close to the kernel driver and system layer, I am not sure I would mess things around like that. Probably re-installation could save more time than messing around, unless you really want to mess around :P .

  2. Well Geforce2 MX PCI version is available, but I will prefer a 2nd hand 3dfx V3000 if it is a PCI card. Others told me DRI (or some other open source driver...?) is working really good with 3dfx, but 3dfx only has 16 bit color depth in 3D acceleration mode, which is a practical approach considering you only have on 133MB/s bandwidth on a PCI bus (where as AGP 2x has 800-1060MB/s).

     

    Actually, I am going to give away my Abit Intel 440BX motherboard (with AGP 2x slot available), wish I can send you this one.

  3. Again this is just another article of speculation, nobody presents any valid credible evidence until this is brought to court. The Fortune guys may appraise some greedy people as smart businessmen, but ignores the long term consequences of free/open source software's benefit to the IT industry and the ability to improve robustness of IT infrastructure in general. Remember, SCO's Vice president in engineering did jump ship by selling all of his stocks (including exercising options), so how confident the folks inside SCO about its case against IBM? Still hard to say; and is IBM a fool given its one of the greatest patent profolio holder among all business in the world?

     

    What SCO gets to people's nerve is its loud and clear(ly FUD) PR machine, the more IBM cannot bear its PR coup, the more likely IBM will buy it to shut SCO's mouth, this is a low but possibly workable strategy. But I will not call it smart, because after all, it contradicts the morale of competition by merit - but by clever rip off and bite of others.

  4. No problem :) .

     

    sunrex from Taiwan informed me that there is another useful document, named "Star Office 6.0 Migration Guide" (an 130-page PDF):

     

    StarOffice 6.0 Office Suite: Migration Guide

    < Migrating from Microsoft Office to StarOffice Software >

    http://se.sun.com/edu/staroffice/so_migrat...ation_guide.pdf

     

    It is pretty in-depth and talks about various issues come up when converting MS Office documents to StarOffice/OpenOffice documents.

     

    Hope you guys find it useful too.

  5. Today I came across Slashdot.org's book review on Special Edition Using Star Office 6.0, besides the debate of MS Office vs Star Office/Open Office, it occured to me that Star Office User Guide (for Windows user, but most content are applicable to Linux version except those related to file/directory management) is freely available for download, as a PDF from Sun's Official site:

     

    http://www.eos.ncsu.edu/software/staroffice/

     

    Other Star Office 6 documents:

    http://docs.sun.com/db/coll/999.2?q=staroffice

     

    Well since most functions on Open Office and Star Office are pretty similar, this could be handly for those who want to learn more about Open Office as well.

  6. SCO will bring this case to the Court, and presents the evidence, if they have any, the point being can these so-called IP related code be replaced? And if they are replaced, can Linux march on as it did?

     

    This is however, nothing but assumptions. Since SCO will only talk in Court or under NDA. I however, believe SCO will lose in the long run, even it could win in Court. The open source effort is about sharing effort and communication between developers and end users. What SCO did is neither of them.

     

    The lawsuit, depending on IBM's response, could probably be a long one. I cannot say SCO can completely justify its stance but keep FUDing as along as possible. Well, this is pathetic, and until SCO argues in court any speculation isn't much useful but wild imagination based on... well... probably next to nothing present in public.

  7. ramfree here, spreading more FUD because i cant give a source to what i have said.

     

    Stop spreading FUD, ramfree17 :P .

     

    Time to get a mod around here :P .

     

    As for SCO, I hardly think its case can stand in the court, but as others have suggested, SCO already benefited from this spread of FUD and collection of royalties from Microsoft. In essence, it is doing the dirty work for Microsoft without using Microsoft's name. I guess it no longer deserves the media coverage it already has, and neither for my posting in this forum on topic about it. 8)

×
×
  • Create New...