Jump to content

Rainer

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rainer

  1. Just a quick question really - is it common for there to be a sizeable lag regards security update advisories etc and the packages appearing on your chosen update mirrors - there's advisories out today but:

     

    urpmi --update --auto-select

     

    produces:

     

    Everything already installed

  2. This is what I've had some luck with tonight: (after a few retry's/reboots/ etc) - - drop them in at a root prompt - bit adhoc but worked in the end.

     

    urpmi.addmedia --update updates http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates with media_info/hdlist.cz
    
    urpmi.addmedia main http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/10.1/i586/media/main with media_info/hdlist.cz
    
    urpmi.addmedia contrib http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/10.1/i586/media/contrib with media_info/hdlist.cz

     

    and take it from there - good luck.

  3. Hi all - just installed 10.1 official - set up an urpmi update source from Easyurpmi: ie

     

    urpmi.addmedia --update updates http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates with media_info/hdlist.cz

     

    Then issued:

     

    urpmi --update --auto-select

     

    Says it's got to install around 73 packages for dependancies (around 240mb) - now - it seemed to be updating succesfully and then near the end it errored - so I then issue urpmi --update --auto-select again to see what updates were left and I get:

     

    To satisfy dependencies, the following 5 packages are going to be installed (20 MB):
    drakxtools-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586
    drakxtools-backend-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586
    drakxtools-newt-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586
    harddrake-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586
    harddrake-ui-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586
    Is this OK? (Y/n) y

     

    I then get these errors on "yes"

     

        http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./harddrake-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-backend-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./harddrake-ui-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
    ...retrieving failed: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-newt-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
    ...retrieving failed: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
    
    
    
    ...retrieving failed: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
    
    
    
           0% of 14 completed, ETA = --:--:--, speed = 182
    
    ...retrieving failed: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
    
    
    ...retrieving failed: curl failed: exited with 22 or signal 0
    
    Installation failed, some files are missing:
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-backend-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./harddrake-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./harddrake-ui-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
       http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mandrakelinux/official/updates/10.1/main_updates/./drakxtools-newt-10.1-27.1.101mdk.i586.rpm
    You may want to update your urpmi database
    
    
    
    
    ...retrieving failed: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404

     

    Does anyone know what those final few update errors are and any remedy etc.

     

    Thanks alot.

  4. Thanks guys - I'll have a look back through the msec documentation - think it was updated 2002 or something last time I checked - is there a "solved" button or something for members to finish a thread or do the mods do that - thanks.

  5. Thanks all - does anyone know the specific reason why in the MCC, the "Higher" reccomendation is:

     

    "If your machine is only a client on the Internet, you should choose a lower level."

     

    Is it just that using "higher" on a daily basis is too awkward for a typical desktop computer/user - ie being restricted to your home directory etc?

  6. Hi - I'm unsure as to what constitutes a "local" zone in shorewall (for my comp) - after setting the default outbound policy to DROP in /etc/shorewall/policy with:

     

    fw	net	DROP

     

    you can then allow basic web surfing by adding this to /etc/shorewall/rules:

     

    ACCEPT fw net udp 53
    ACCEPT fw net tcp 80

     

    ie you're allowing outbound DNS queries and outbound connections to port 80 - now, this works fine/good and everything's ok - but - what I am unsure about is whether "fw" is definately the correct representation of my local zone (in the above rules), as opposed to say "loc" or "eth0" or a private ip adress like "192.168.0.2".

     

    Thanks.

  7. Hi - any advice on whether to run on "Standard", "High" or "Higher" for an ordinary web surfing, email, etc computer on the net (Mandrake 10.1 CE) ? - in the MCC, the "Higher" wording says:

     

    "If your machine is only a client on the Internet, you should choose a lower level."

     

    So, is it ok to use "Higher" or would everyone reccomend just using "Standard" or "High".

     

    Thanks.

  8. Hi all - just a couple of questions:

     

    1) - Are there any security updates for 10.1 Community Edition? - have used EasyUrpmi to add Main & Contrib repositories - but after a month of checking regularly there still isn't an "updates" respository on EasyUrpmi for 10.1 CE.

     

    2) - In the absence of an updates repo. for 10.1 CE, should you just manually update the security advisory packages using urpmi/rpm? - would like to update libxpm4.

     

    3) - Does anyone know when 10.1 Official will come out in a .iso format for general download?

     

    Thanks for any help.

×
×
  • Create New...