jlc
-
Posts
2570 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by jlc
-
-
All I have to say is WOW!
This is very responsive desktop, solaris kernel/dtrace/zfs........ love it!
Biggest downside that I like to play in is zones and they don't have support for it :(
f-spot doesn't work, missing dbus-sharp, but the dir is still updating with packages.
-
I just upgaded my 4 box to 5 with apt-get upgrade/dist-upgrade which took it from opensolaris build 36-40 which is pretty cool!
Anyone that wants to try some of the cool stuff in solaris but like apt-get ala debian/ubuntu than you should check it out :)
-
thx! You'd think there'd be an improvement from devel to release, not the other way around, and not twice as bad Just a few days ago, and before, I hardly ever touched my swap, but now I do every boot. Haven't singled anything out, just seems a lot of things are using more mem, and I wish I new why and if anything can be done about it.
/bvc goes searching......
YEah, i know it was running debug, but I run rawhide and opensolaris and they weren't as slow so I just gave up on it :)
If you try FC5, don't forget about the respin dvd if bittorrents not bad.
-
any one that ran/runs Dapper and FC5 got any comments on speed/performance between the 2? I don't care about bootup just after login. Dapper is tearing me up. I told myself to keep the month old devel version and not upgrade to the release, because everyhting was hunkydory, but noOOOo....I had to I have to turn nautilus off, use a light metacity and the thinice engine to get anything done.
I know I'm biased, but what the hey :)
I installed the last one or two before final on my laptop and it drove me crazy, with in an 2 or 3 hours, i was back in Fedora. YMMV, from what i hear people say the same thing about Fedora, but it feels and response a lot faster than dapper did on my box and I treat my OS pretty hard :)
I also run selilnux, which can take a hit on performance, but again, i don't feel any slow down in fc5 that i did in dapper.
-
I finished downloading it. ( my work is very gracious in allowing me to do this.) I have a question however, can I download the updates and install them from a disc? I live in the country with horrible phone lines, thus crappy dial up. If not I may not burn these.
Sure, you can create a local repository with "createrepo" :)
Or somethng like yum localinstall *.rpm should look through them and update too.
-
I might try it in vmware to see what I'm missing out on. FC4 was OK, but the only niggles that annoyed me were that when I logged in as root, I could use most of the tools without having to provide the full path /sbin/chkconfig, etc, etc. When logged in as a normal user, and then going to superuser, you had to use the path. Maybe just a bashrc config or something :unsure:
However, I still mostly use Mandriva, and probably still will.
edit .bash_profile
PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:/usr/sbin
normal
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/justin/bin
root
# echo $PATH
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin
or you could add all of that to it
PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
If you think PATH is bad in FC5, don't touch Solaris :)
-
Did you test Synaptic too? I really like synaptic though unfortunately it´s broken in Cooker (and so is smart --gui) :( I would be interested to see a test of synaptic...
I haven't used synaptic/apt-get in a couple years on fedora/rh :)
-
One thing i did forget to tell you though is after the script is run and you open smart-gui and look at the channels, is that Livna-Stable is enabled. I disabled mine before I used it to update to the latest kernel release.
We chatted on IRC, but thought I would say it here :)
Why FX would bring this is up, because Freshrpms/dags/dries/rpmforge and Livna most of the time wont mix well together because of overlapping packages that can be a different version strings.
However, thats the good thing with priority's.
Livna-stable is set to 10
fresh/dag/dries/rpmforge is set to 100
Which basically means if its in "100" install/upgrade, if its in 10 that don't unless i tell you to, like nvidia/fglrx drivers.
-
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060612#opinion
I agree, of course.......
If you are still undecided about which distribution to try on your system, take a good look at Fedora Core 5. It is possibly one of the most stable and dependable Linux distributions ever built!Oh boy, this post has the smell of fire all around it....
-
... although my current favourite is gentoo's portage system, which contains 100,000+ packages, even without overlays which i also use.
Is that a typo ;)
100,000+ seems a bit high......
-
I tried to install without your script and I don't think I did very good. So I removed smart and reinstalled with your script and it looks like yours when I run the "smart channel --show".
Thanks for the script jlc!!!
And yes I'm back in Fedora and having fun. Just wish I could get my tv tuner card to work. lol
Cool, first lab rat it worked :)
-
I added some scripts to make installing and setting up repositorys easy
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/showth...94&page=1&pp=15
or my blog entry
-
Just a little offtopic. But would you advise CentOS as server? And can I install additional packages with yum?
I´m still looking for a good server distro and I like the Fedora structure very much.
Very much, I do :)
Very stable rock solid distro, its built from the same sources as Red Hat Enterprise.
-
Red Hat, using EL4 Update 2. I couldn't wait to install whilst I had Update 3 ISO's downloading, and just wanted to save installing without reinstall :P
Ah, is this a company box that your using rhel 4 on but don't have it setup for RHN?
If so, and these are just iso's you d/l that are freely avaible, no problem there, but i would suggest using centos, rebuild of rhel4 only has "yum" :)
[justin@pillar ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.3 (Final)
-
OK, I'll have a go at this when I'm back in the office in a couple of weeks. Not got yum installed, but I'm sure I can find it :P
Oh, i was thinking fedora :)
Are you on RH or CentOS?
-
If you made your list with rpm -qa you would want to do this first:
rpm -qa xmms\* gaim\* videolan-client\* > new_list.txt cat new_list.txt gaim-gaym-0.96-3.fc5 xmms-libs-1.2.10-23.fc5 gaim-meanwhile-1.2.8-2.fc5 gaim-guifications-2.13-0.beta2.fc5.rf xmms-1.2.10-22.fc5 gaim-encryption-2.38-2.fc5 xmms-wma-1.0.5-3.fc5.rf xmms-cdread-0.14-11.fc5 gaim-1.5.0-16.fc5 xmms-mp3-1.2.10-16.fc5.rf gaim-otr-3.0.0-2.fc5.rf videolan-client-0.8.5-1.fc5 xmms-skins-1.2.10-13 gaim-irchelper-0.12-1.fc5.rf gaim-plugin_pack-1.0-0.beta3.fc5.rf
Now remove the numbers and extra blobs:
$ sed -i s/-[0-9].*// new_list.txt $ cat new_list.txt gaim-gaym xmms-libs gaim-meanwhile gaim-guifications xmms gaim-encryption xmms-wma xmms-cdread gaim xmms-mp3 gaim-otr videolan-client xmms-skins gaim-irchelper gaim-plugin_pack
-
Use SED and CAT
Example:
The file:
$ cat list-of-packages xmms-skins xmms-wma xmms-mp3 xmms-cdread videolan-client gaim\*
We'll create a new file to include yum and end of line /
$ echo '#!/bin/bash' > yumlist.sh $ echo 'yum --exclude=*\debug\* install \' >> yumlist.sh $ cat yumlist.sh #!/bin/bash yum --exclude=*\debug\* install \
Now we will add a space and / to the end of the file from your list of packages file:
sed it:
$ sed 's/$/ \\/' list-of-packages >> yumlist.sh
Add something to the bottom so it doesn't end with /
echo 'echo "done"' >> yumlist.sh
Revised file:
$ cat yumlist.sh #!/bin/bash yum --exclude=*\debug\* install \ xmms-skins \ xmms-wma \ xmms-mp3 \ xmms-cdread \ videolan-client \ gaim\* \ echo "done"
Install the file
# sh list-of-packages.yum<SNIP>
Installing:
gaim i386 1:1.5.0-16.fc5 updates 4.3 M
gaim-encryption i386 2.38-2.fc5 freshrpms 93 k
gaim-gaym i386 0.96-3.fc5 extras 97 k
gaim-guifications i386 2.13-0.beta2.fc5.rf rpmforge 262 k gaim-irchelper i386 0.12-1.fc5.rf rpmforge 22 k
gaim-meanwhile i386 1.2.8-2.fc5 extras 57 k
gaim-otr i386 3.0.0-2.fc5.rf rpmforge 41 k
gaim-plugin_pack i386 1.0-0.beta3.fc5.rf rpmforge 46 k
videolan-client i386 0.8.5-1.fc5 freshrpms 6.2 M
xmms-cdread i386 0.14-11.fc5 extras 37 k
xmms-mp3 i386 1:1.2.10-16.fc5.rf rpmforge 87 k
xmms-skins i386 1:1.2.10-13 extras 2.6 M
xmms-wma i386 1.0.5-3.fc5.rf rpmforge 79 k
Installing for dependencies:
xmms i386 1:1.2.10-22.fc5 extras 1.9 M
xmms-libs i386 1:1.2.10-23.fc5 extras 245 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 15 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 16 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
Is that what you wanted?
-
Old topic, but the game is being released June 15, 2006 and will cost $45.00
PCBurn did a review of it
-
so do these updates make it so you can install NVIDIA drivers? I seem to remember people having trouble with that.
Yep, you install the respin and it will have the updated kernel that will work right off the bat.
These ISOs are based upon Fedora Core 5 and all updates released as of May 23rd, 2006.Which there have been 2-4 kernel updates since intial release I think. (just guessing)
-
I know the last one I installed, with everything I put on it, there were about 700-800mb worth of updates to d/l so this is nice if anyone wants to try FC5 now with updates included.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-anno...e/msg00000.html
http://torrent.fedoraunity.org/torrents
-
If you use Fedora, don't disable SELinux, just use a work around:
http://james-morris.livejournal.com/11429.html
It appears that some of the libraries they distribute require the execmod permission, which is not granted by default under SELinux. The above workaround above relabels the supplied libraries so that SELinux policy will consider them "safe" to perform operations constrained by the execmod permission. This in fact may be unsafe, although this workaround is certainly better than completely disabling SELinux.I love unsafe programs, sign me up right now!!!! :unsure:
-
Anyway, Linus is free to use what he want's, its obvious that he cares not for messing with his distro, but more for having one that works, is stable, and up to date, so that he can continue his role as collaborator and developer unhindered. I don't really think any fuss or discussion should be put into it, he's human just like us and can choose what works best for him. Because it works best for him, is no indication that it will work best for our uses, so picking something entirely because Linus uses it, is plain idiocy, thus, it shouldnt really matter to us what he uses.
James
Which is why he says:
At some point I decided it doesn't really matter any more: the market is big enough that nobody cares what _I_ do, so just for simplicityI ended up doing just one distribution so that my different machines looked as similar as possible.
I just wanted to stir the pot up, thought it would be fun......
My personal opinion is that Fedora really isn't for new people, but new folks can use it. There gui's are just little python interfaces, that don't break anything like the other "two" can break if you go and change it by hand :) It has to many advanced feautres that most distros don't have and can be a little bleeding for most folks to deal with.
Take SELinux for example, Google has a working Picasa for Linux, what do they tell Fedora users to do because SELinux "breaks" it? Tell you to turn it off!!! Instead of looking at the code and saying hey, maybe this is not so secure.
http://james-morris.livejournal.com/11429.html
-
http://www.thenetworkadministrator.com/Linus%20Torvalds.htm
Thought this was interesting too, he uses such the noob distro...... :huh:
-
These tools are all about lock-in and making other distro's look hard but many noobies sucessfully install and configure gentoo without any of these tools. (or arch or slack etc.)
I disgree, if you want to talk about lock-in there's only one OS that is well suited to that description! These GUI tools are a means of making the distro "more accessable", rather than to lock a user in.
What Gowator is saying is once you get used to these tools, you wonder were they are in other distors and don't want switch once you don't find them, added with that you really "might" not understand what there doing in the background and end up not having a clue how to do anything outside the gui. Which is a very stong place in *nix ;)
Nexenta Alpha 5 released!
in Other Linux and Unix Distributions
Posted
Good, not as good as Linux, but all my hardware has worked :)