MandrakeUser.Org - Your Mandrake-Linux Knowledge Base!


 
 

* DocIndex - Basics

File System Hierarchy I

* General Characteristics
* Reasons and Consequences
* Current Problems

Related Resources:

File system Hierarchy Standard (FHS)
MDK Reference, II.8

Revision / Modified: April 20, 2002
Author: Tom Berger

 

* General Characteristics

Operation systems of the Unix family feature a file system order that is

  • thoroughly hierarchical (one 'directory tree'),
  • specific to the function of a file and not to its program context (no 'program directories').

Hierarchy here means that the directory tree is indeed one tree. Directories follow a designed order starting from the root directory ('/') instead of having so-called 'drives'.
Within MS Windows, you may put your files (almost) anywhere: on 'C', 'D', 'E' etc. Hierarchical structures are managed by the programs themselves ('program directories') and not by the operating system.
Unix (and therefore Linux) on the other hand sorts directories ascending from the root directory '/' according to their importance for the boot process. And here it is the operating system that determines into which directories programs have to put their files into. Directories are not program- but function-specific.

If you install a program in MS Windows, it usually stores most of its files in its own directory structure. A help file for instance may be in 'program name\' or in 'program_name\help' or in 'program name\hoopy\frog\turnip'.
In Linux, programs put their documentation into '/usr/share/doc/program_name', man pages into '/usr/share/man/man[1-9]', info pages into '/usr/share/info'.That is they are merged with the system hierarchy.

* section index * top

* Reasons And Consequences

One reason for this arrangement is that a centralized file system hierarchy is much easier to administer. For instance changes on one machine can be easily transferred to the clients on the network.

A consequence of this structure is the concept of partition mounts which usually confuses new users. All GNU/Linux partitions on your hard drive are mounted to ('hooked into') mount directories (aka 'mount points'). And you access them via these directories ('/' or '/usr' or '/mnt/cdrom' etc). This assures a seamless integration into the system, regardless if the mount is a local partition or one on the network server. And the mount names stay the same, if there are partitions or external media mounted to them or not. In contrast to Windows, where an additional local 'drive letter' changes all the 'drive letters' behind it and networked partitions are handled as extra 'drives'.

Another reason is that Linux caches a lot of disk accesses using system memory while it is running to accelerate these accesses.
It is therefore vitally important that these buffers are 'flushed' (i.e. get their content written to disk), before the system closes down. Else files are left in an 'undetermined state'. And that's a very bad thing for files to be left in.
Flushing is achieved by 'unmounting' the partitions during proper system shutdown. Don't switch your system off while it is running! You may get away with it quite often, since the Linux file system is very robust, but you may also wreak havoc upon important files. Just hit <CTRL ALT DEL> or use the proper commands (e.g. init 6) / buttons. This will shut down the system in a decent way and reboot it. And thus guarantee the integrity of your files.

* section index * top

* Current Problems

So far, I've told you how it should be. Now about how it is in the real world ;-).

As you will see on the following pages, the implementation of this concept on Linux isn't perfect. Some people would even say it's far from perfect.
Linux has always attracted individualists. And these people tend to have their own opinion about a great many things, like for instance into which directories certain files should be put into. With the arrival of different distributions, these different opinions became manifest. Some distributions put mount directories for external media into the 'root' directory, others - like Mandrake Linux - into '/mnt'. Red Hat based distributions feature the '/etc/sysconfig' sub-hierarchy for configuration files concerning input and network devices. Other distributions do not have this directory at all and put the appropriate files elsewhere or even use completely different mechanisms to do the same thing. Some distributions put KDE into '/opt/', others - like Mandrake Linux - into '/usr'

But even within a given file system hierarchy, there are inconsistencies. The graphical subsystem, XFree86, has its own directory hierarchy, for example. The hierarchy has not so much been designed as 'grown'. So there are weeds.

This isn't much of a problem as long as you compile programs yourself: you can then adapt their configure scripts or Makefiles to your system's configuration. But it's different if you install pre-compiled packages like RPMs. Often these are not adaptable from one file system hierarchy to another. What's worse: some RPMs might even create their own hierarchy. If you, say, install a KDE RPM from the SuSE Linux distribution on your ML system, the binary will be put into '/opt/kde2/bin'. And thus it won't work, because ML expects it to be in '/usr/bin'.

There are of course ways to circumvent this problem (discussed in the article on RPM), but the current situation clearly is unsatisfying. Therefore all the leading GNU/Linux distributors have joined the Linux Standard Base project, which is currently trying to create a common standard for GNU/Linux distributions. As you might imagine, this isn't easy, because changing the file system hierarchy means a lot of work for distributors. And so every distributor tries to push a standard which will allow him to keep as much of his own hierarchy as possible ...

The LSB will also encompass the proposals made by the File system Hierarchy Standard project (FHS, former FSSTND). Starting with 7.2, Mandrake Linux has taken some pains to reorganize its file system hierarchy for greater FHS and LSB compliance. These changes will be discussed on the next pages, too.

* section index * top

* The root Directory


 
Legal: All texts on this site are covered by the GNU Free Documentation License. Standard disclaimers of warranty apply. Copyright LSTB (Tom Berger) and Mandrakesoft 1999-2002.