phunni Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 Please do, I'm intrigued! :P Your just a big fanny! :lol: j/k I wonder how many people from the US know that fanny means something different to people in the UK... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnr Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 I'd imagine it means the same here, that was a non-standard usage up above :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phunni Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 I get the impression that fanny refers to your bum in the US - is this correct? If so - that's not what we mean by it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnr Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 Interesting, my wife and I have both lived in the UK and fanny was used in that way. I accept that there is another usage, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phunni Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 I've never heard fanny used to mean bum over here - although I suppose some people might use it for that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ixthusdan Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 fanny= lower lobotomy fan= enthusiastic supporter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnr Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 I've never heard fanny used to mean bum over here - although I suppose some people might use it for that <nod> Well, we lived there (individually - didn't know each other then) in the '80's and early '90's -- ages ago and long enough for a change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlc Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 I was just saying FAN, but in a stupid way. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bhrich902 Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 i agree with rcxau, just add a bunch of sources to your urpmi database and dependencies should be dealt with no problem. i recently came into linux through mandrake 9.1 and i was so pist at how it didn't install apps like a mac or win box would (double click and bang), then i stumbled on to this simple solution and had no more problems with it, i love urpmi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
null Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 I was a noob on mandrake and had so much trouble installing things (rpm, never really tried urpmi). I tried to get urpmi set up but guess I did something a little wrong. Anyway, on redhat 9 with apt-get it's just so much more enjoyable to install stuff. No work at all, just sit back and watch it go... no dependency probs, no conflicts, everything a-ok (at least so far... :lol: ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramfree17 Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 Anyway, on redhat 9 with apt-get it's just so much more enjoyable to install stuff. No work at all, just sit back and watch it go... no dependency probs, no conflicts, everything a-ok (at least so far... :lol: ) but apt-get is also available for mandrake. i havent used it but i know granpappy anon does. ciao! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 me too! :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
null Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 so why's everyone always talking about urpmi, urpmi, urpmi... :? although I haven't used urpmi, I don't see how it could possibly be better than apt-get .... (also I did not know apt was available for mdk - thanks for that tip :) ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 urpm* is native, therefore there are a lot more mirrors/sources available, so, more pkgs. It's not better.....it's getting better...maybe someday, but I don't see how it could get 'better' :wink: ...as good, yes!...better?...we'll see :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulSe Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 I speak from my _limited_ experience, but as a perpetual-n00b, it could be good advice: Lets start with Redhat I used 7.1, 7.2 and 9.0 - Nice distro, very clean, stable and friendlyish. I like the install, liked rpms, but the lack of a good package managment system (like urpmi) made me look elsewhere. Of course now Redhat has apt-get for rpms, so I might try it again one day. So I moved onto Mandrake I used 8.1, 8.2, 9.0, 9.1 - Loved the distro and have stuck with it since. Urpmi fulfilled my dreams of a good package managment system. Very friendly, but a serious distro if you want it to be. Love the drakes and it makes running a server a dream. Problems: Mandrake messing around with libraries like gcc, making compiling a nightmare for a newbie. Urpmi is great, but hdlists can be huge and installing/maintaining a decent list can be treacherous, especially on dialup. I'm convinced that nay distro is next to useless without a permanent 'net connection. So, now I am in the process of installing Gentoo - Slick, powerful, Portage is superior to urpmi (IMO) and now with GRP, I don't need to spend hours compiling or downloading packs. It is a more serious distro (no drakes, etc) and forces you to do things the Linux way, so I am learning quite a bit. Comes with excellent documentation to guide you through everything. When Mandrake 10 is released, I will most probably buy a box set. I love Mandrake and will always keep it around on one box or another. IMO it is the best distro for dekstop users who need a friendly distro. at the moment. I also use the BBC (Bootable Business Card), the recent version which fits on a miniature CD. I love it, pop it into the CD drive and boot into a fully operational distro, including X, Mozilla, and a few other handy apps. Great as a rescue disk as well. Those are my opinions, I have messed around with Debian, SME-Server and a few other distros, but not enough to give you valuable advice on them :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.