SoulSe Posted June 11, 2005 Report Share Posted June 11, 2005 Geforce FX5700 Ultra - 256MB. I haven't come across any games that don't play nicely - Doom 3, HL2, all fine. When I do, I'll get a 6800GT. My opinion: While ATI works in Linux, Nvidia always works better, with less fuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet2k5 Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 I lied I dont' have the 6800 Ultra. I wish, I do however want what ^ that guy has, can't find it :( . It's a really good card the local LAN parties had it on all their computers for quite a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ac_dispatcher Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 Chaintech FX5200 (nvidia) No gamer but it works good. ~2000FPS in glxgears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet2k5 Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 heh take that from 390 from what I get and you USED to get :P Lol this is funny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iphitus Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 Intel Integrated 855GM/855GME Chipset Graphics Controller. Long way of saying 'crap'. But hey, I can comfortably play ET at 800x600, medium gfx, so im happy. iphitus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k6h Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 GeForce FX 5700 [128 MB] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monolith Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Radeon 9600 pro 256mb - 2241 FPS in glxgears Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaschtroumpf Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 geforce 6800 Ultra, what's up wtih gforce4's are they better than my puppy? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> GF4 are the older generation. Of course NVidia really muddle the waters with the GeForce4 naming: a GF4 MX is really a form of GF2 and was a budget card even when it was brand new. The Ti ("Titanium") series was the top of the line about 2 years ago and still holds its own quite well for most current games, although under Windows it doesn't suport some of the features of DirectX 9 and may not play some of the brand new games that require some of DirectX 9 features like v1.4 pixel shaders. ((Battle Field 2 comes to mind). The "FX" series of NVidia cards was the first to support shaders 1.4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kristi Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 geforce 6800 Ultra, what's up wtih gforce4's are they better than my puppy? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> GF4 are the older generation. Of course NVidia really muddle the waters with the GeForce4 naming: a GF4 MX is really a form of GF2 and was a budget card even when it was brand new. The Ti ("Titanium") series was the top of the line about 2 years ago and still holds its own quite well for most current games, although under Windows it doesn't suport some of the features of DirectX 9 and may not play some of the brand new games that require some of DirectX 9 features like v1.4 pixel shaders. ((Battle Field 2 comes to mind). The "FX" series of NVidia cards was the first to support shaders 1.4 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm not a gamer but I use a XFX GeF4Ti4200 and play NWN occasionally Kristi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulSe Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 My FX5700 Ultra after the latest driver upgrade and running at 1280x1024 with regular glxgears window: 16263 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3252.600 FPS 16270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3254.000 FPS 16277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3255.400 FPS 16262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3252.400 FPS 16263 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3252.600 FPS Does life get any better? Maybe with a 6800.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowe Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 20368 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4073.600 FPS 20370 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4074.000 FPS 20367 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4073.400 FPS 20368 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4073.600 FPS 20367 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4073.400 FPS The sad thing is it was at 22*** frames in 5.0 seconds yesterday. :( But still ok, on debian i got 19*** frames in 5.0 seconds now i run gentoo it's went up! So i should be happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kristi1 Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 (edited) [kristi@c-65-96-162-92 ~]$ glxgears15846 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3169.200 FPS 18498 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3699.600 FPS 18497 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3699.400 FPS 18429 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3685.800 FPS 18515 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3703.000 FPS 18427 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3685.400 FPS 18508 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3701.600 FPS 18474 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3694.800 FPS GeF4Ti4200 MDV2005A 7174 driver But, as mentioned, the FX series will do stuff the Ti's can't, so it's not just a matter of speed. Kristi Edited June 15, 2005 by kristi1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulSe Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Remember when posting glxgears fps output to include your resolution and make sure you don't resize the glxgears window and keep it active (glxgears gives the output of the active window). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowe Posted June 16, 2005 Report Share Posted June 16, 2005 I resized the window for fun and look! 92325 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18465.000 FPS 95014 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19002.800 FPS 96250 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19250.000 FPS :lol: Seriously though, 1280x1024. 20275 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4055.000 FPS 20266 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4053.200 FPS 20179 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4035.800 FPS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joethesupercow Posted June 17, 2005 Report Share Posted June 17, 2005 GeForce FX 5700LE, soon to be GeForce 6600GT :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.