qeldroma Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 1. Is vanilla the original "kernel.org"-kernel? 2. Is there a page, which gives me an overview of interesting patches for vanilla? 3. Which patches do you recommend? 4. And why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest frew Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 1: yes 2: I don't know but there probably is 3: I don't remember if they have been merged into 2.4 yet but the preemption patch and the other one that is like it are both great. (studies show that BOTH is good.) 4: Faster! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 1. Is vanilla the original "kernel.org"-kernel?Yes2. Is there a page, which gives me an overview of interesting patches for vanilla?I dk of one.3. Which patches do you recommend?None, the mdk kernel is highly optimized with a ton of patches. Using the preempt or low latency isn't going to get you a noticable performance increase, UNLESS, you run a lot of big resource eating apps at the same time and max out your physical RAM. It's my experience anyway.http://www.club-nihil.net/mub/viewtopic.ph...ghlight=latency http://www.club-nihil.net/mub/viewtopic.ph...ghlight=latency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest frew Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 Oh and #2 https://lwn.net/KernelPatches/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qeldroma Posted October 22, 2002 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Looks like patching is not really interesting, isn't it? Is there a patch i HAVE to build in, if i am using the default vanilla? This is NO server, NOR big memory, just a (often) manipulated TBird-station. Thanks for the patch link, i noticed, that they are mostly developper orientated, didn't knew that, thought patches are more basically like adding support for a special hardware. In real they are just addOns in the development circle of the kernel, towards the next version, am i right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Looks like patching is not really interesting, isn't it? I had fun with the preempt low latency, and 2.5 kernel.Is there a patch i HAVE to build in, if i am using the default vanilla?Probably not..... i noticed, that they are mostly developper orientated.....thought patches are more basically like adding support for a special hardware.......In real they are just addOns in the development circle of the kernel, towards the next version, am i right? Looks like it from the link. Usually, hardware support IS the reason for patching, from an end user point of view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.