Jump to content

2008 release date


tf1
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It is supposed to hit the mirrors late this week or early next week afaik. They are fixing the last show-stoppers right now. It is always better to wait a few days and release a reasonably stable system than rushing things and having a rather bug-riddled release that will give you bad pr. Jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

arctic: I've always run GNOME, and I don't see any problem with it at the moment. I don't know what's up with your setup, but...it's not a general problem...

 

and yes, there's still some very last-minute fixes going on at the moment, I saw a changelog for Evince go through a minute ago...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... maybe I am once again the one person that runs into problems with gnome. But honestly, adam: I have ran into annoying Gnome-bugs in Mdv2006 (nautilus burner buggy), 2007 (infrequent change of file-ownership), 2007.1 (gdm buggy) and now 2008 (nautilus eating all cpu infrequently; Gnome 2.20 desktop reacts slower compared to Gnome 2.16 and 2.18).

 

I don't think that it is a problem with my hardware as I run fedora and debian testing on the same hardware and there I never ran into these problems (except the nautilus burner delay, but that well known bug was fixed in a few days in fedora). KDE has been very solid on my Mandriva test-systems, but I am a Gnomer (cannot help it) and not that I want to badmouth Mandriva, but 2008 still needs a bit of Gnome-polishing imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Early seeders just got the word. I started, but it's still a bit slow to download.

 

Incidently, I figured it'd be fun to download the ftp cooker mirrors, so I did. over 54GB in what, half a day or so?

(I got both x64 and i586...)

 

I guess if you install now from cooker with network/ftp install, you get 2008.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

arctic: our GNOME packages are pretty simple, really. they're very close to upstream, Fred keeps them as close as he can, he's very down on external patches.

 

as I said, I run GNOME only on my system, which is obviously heavily used, and I've never seen any problem like you describe.

 

do you have any idea what nautilus is *doing*?

 

artee / qandd: yep, the initial downloads to early seeders aren't super-fast; this demonstrates the need for early seeding. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you have any idea what nautilus is *doing*?
Apart from eating my CPU it is doing absolutely nothing (except displaying my 3D-less desktop). If I kill nautilus as root from a tty and restart nautilus later, then the cpu-eating is gone. If I simply restart the X server, then two nautilus processes are running, each using some 45 percent of cpu power, thus I have to kill nautilus from tty if I want the system to act in a normal way.

 

If I knew why nautilus would eat my cpu at irregular times, I'd let you know immediately but alas I have no idea what could be wrong. Back tracing doesn't reveal anything either...

 

I guess I will retry with a clean install. Maybe the bug is caused by some bad packages I downloaded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...