grendal Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 ok Gnome lovers, This KDE users is ready to make the switch. Without trashing KDE, sell me on Gnome. I always read how you guys think it's better, so whats better? If you want to know what distro, it will be either Fedora 7 or Mandriva Spring. I haven't made up my febile mind yet. I really like spring, but I am now feeling my way around Fedora. Does Nautilus still open in multiple windows? (by Default-I haven't used gnome in a long time) I'm on dial up, can I use kppp? or what is the gnome version? Not that I have used it much, but what about karamba? Gnomebreaker v K3B, how do they stack up? I'm guessing that mplayer, xmms, audacity, etc all run fine? what do I use to rip cds? Themes? Icons? tweaking tips? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arctic Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 KDE is better than Gnome. Gnome is better than KDE. It depends on your preferences. You can try gnome first on your current system. If you like it, then switch to a gnome-centric distro (Fedora, Ubuntu, Frugalware, ...). If you prefer KDE, stick to a KDE centric distro (Mandriva, Sidux, Slackware, ...) Remember that you can use the KDE apps (even Karamba) in Gnome and vice versa (e.g. gdesklets). I find the Gnome apps to be very good. Gnomebaker is slowly getting as good as K3B, but K3B is still the king when it comes to graphical-burning tools (although I don't need it). Nautilus can be used in browser or spatial window mode. Your choice. Ripping CDs: Soundjuicer or grip. Multimedia apps? No problem. They run fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendal Posted June 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 Thanks for the reply. And since I'm using Fedora, I thought I should also make a switch to Gnome. I debated on what to post, but since I can't remember the last time I used it, I thought I would ask why others seemed to like it, without getting into the usual flame war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyme Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 I enjoy the simpler, and to me, more intuitive interface. I find KDE's system of menu's and it's control center to be overly complex and badly designed. I also find themes that are available for GNOME to be far more artistic and pleasing to the eye than 99.9% of KDE themes (KDE themes always seem so....bulky, save for a small portion of them). Those are my opinions and by no means constitute facts, so arguing with them is pointless because I have used both DE's extensively and know what I like ;) To answer your questions more specifically: Does Nautilus still open in multiple windows? (by Default-I haven't used gnome in a long time)Yes, but as arctic said, you can modify this behavior.I'm on dial up, can I use kppp? or what is the gnome version?You can use KPP, but as I don't use dial-up I honestly don't know what the GNOME app for dial-up is.Not that I have used it much, but what about karamba?Using Karamba in GNOME might be problematic, but there are other options, like gdesklets.Gnomebreaker v K3B, how do they stack up?I've never used gnomebreaker....so I can't compare...Themes? Icons? tweaking tips?gnome-look.org also, for applications, check out http://www.gnomefiles.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coverup Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Which interface to use is a matter of personal preference.... until things go so wrong that you need to fix or restore configuration files. I found that fixing KDE configuration files is a lot easier than fixing GNOME. Gnome apps store their config in an endless number of xml files, and there is no easy way to locate an important property, unless you are a developer:-). KDE is a lot simpler, IMHO. Each application has one or two config files, which are easy to find and fix 'cause they are named <application>rc, <application>.destop, etc. If you need Gnome just to run a spcific application, the application will run under KDE just fine as long as all libraries are installed. You can just install Gnome for the sake of having all necessary libraries, then applications such as evolution or nautilus will run just fine within KDE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianw1974 Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 I think it's gnomebaker than gnomebreaker :) I used KDE for years, and only switched to Gnome earlier this year. I figured I would try it and see how I get on. You need to give yourself time to use it. First time I tried, I gave up after a day and went back to KDE. You have to use it for much longer. And try not using KDE apps, find the gnome equivalents. You'll find it'll be more responsive than trying to run KDE apps in Gnome. Mainly, because you'll need to wait while the KDE libraries load, and then the KDE app will follow. Saying that, after the first app has ran, the libs are loaded, so any other KDE app will be loaded quickly anyhow. But using KDE apps, means you take up much more space on your hard drive installing double the stuff. If you have a large hard disk, then don't worry. I tend to prefer to have my space for my data, because it far outweighs my installed apps. And space is a premium, even on my 80GB hdd in my laptop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coverup Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 But using KDE apps, means you take up much more space on your hard drive installing double the stuff. If you have a large hard disk, then don't worry. I tend to prefer to have my space for my data, because it far outweighs my installed apps. And space is a premium, even on my 80GB hdd in my laptop. Nuh, I have only 5.8G for / and other system partitions, not including /home. Peanuts...:-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyme Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Gnome apps store their config in an endless number of xml files, and there is no easy way to locate an important property, unless you are a developer:-).That's why GNOME has a front-end to these files: gconf-editor. Although I rarely have to use this myself...since my GNOME apps hardly ever break... B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiver_Fluffi Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 That's why GNOME has a front-end to these files: gconf-editor. Although I rarely have to use this myself...since my GNOME apps hardly ever break... B) Although, lets be honest, it's not quite embracing the GUI philosophy of user friendliness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyme Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Although, lets be honest, it's not quite embracing the GUI philosophy of user friendliness.You find me any DE that stores configuration information in a user friendly manner. No, config files do not count - they are not user friendly. There is a point at which a GUI becomes non-user-friendly, most commonly when storing configuration values. If they are accessible via the programs menu's, that's the best you can do - to make a program that has access to every programs settings and make it user friendly is damn near impossible due to the complexity of such a feat. Just look at the registry editor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendal Posted June 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Well, one thing is clear: I need a new pc at home My daughter has taken over the one I have. I didn't have much time to look around on gnome, but so far I like it. I brought the fedora 7 livecd to work and I am using it here at lunch. I think the last time I tried gnome was on Mandrake 9.2, so that was a while ago. I do believe it is called gnomebaker, not breaker. That will probably be me. Like Ian, it will be just making the adjustment to gnome apps from KDE ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianw1974 Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 One other thing, gnomebaker didn't work for me in Fedora 7. I tried to write a DVD and it told me to put a disk in the drive, that was.....already there. I could however burn it with another app from right clicking within Nautilus and selecting the CD/DVD creator option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamw Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 to answer one of the questions in the initial post, yes, Nautilus uses spatial mode (one window per directory) by default, but this is very easy to change - Edit, Preferences, Behavior, Always open in browser windows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavaeolus Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 I would not call Mandriva KDE centric, I think Mandriva does a good job in trying to integrate most Desktop Environments/Window Managers. 5.8 GB for the System should be enough place for both KDE and Gnome, I have 4,8 GB for the System and installed both and have still 1,3 GB free space on my partition. You just can use the app you like, regardless wether it is written for Gnome or KDE, I for example use mostly Gnome, but for browsing my SMB-Network I use SMB4K, for burning I prefer K3B, there are some themes out there that try to give both Environments a somewhat unified look, so switching between apps is not that big problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamw Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 "Computers help us solving problems we would not have without them" I think you just described my entire working life :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.