Jump to content

wireless stopped working again [solved]


mystified
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ok I rebooted my router, deleted my wireless network connection and set it up without any encryption (Yes I changed it in my router :P ). The problem is that when it scans for networks it's not finding mine.

 

Edit: I did some googling and according to a mandriva wiki this driver is considered unstable. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that's unfortunate.

 

do you have your network set to broadcast the SSID? This should be a setting somewhere in the router. If it isn't broadcasting the SSID your system won't pick it up when it scans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you mean tyme. How do I accomplish that?
It's somewhere in the router configuration - the wireless section, where exactly depends on your router. It should just be a check box, by default it usually broadcasts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to reconfigure it using ndiswrapper and the windows drive but when I check hardware it shows it's still using the native driver.

Sorry the native module is not working out for you. Using your favorite editor open /etc/modprobe.conf and add the line:

blacklist bcm43xx

this will prevent the bcm43xx module from loading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry the native module is not working out for you. Using your favorite editor open /etc/modprobe.conf and add the line:
blacklist bcm43xx

this will prevent the bcm43xx module from loading.

 

This didn't work. It's still using bcm43xx. Also I copies the windows driver and I put the .sys and .inf. I checked ndiswrapper and it shows that my driver.inf is installed and hardware found but .sys is an invalid driver. So it gives me a message at the end showing invalid driver. There is no other .sys for this card in windows.

 

Sorry for being a pain. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This didn't work. It's still using bcm43xx. Also I copies the windows driver and I put the .sys and .inf. I checked ndiswrapper and it shows that my driver.inf is installed and hardware found but .sys is an invalid driver.

Well, it should have worked. :P

 

Anyway, make sure you have removed or commented out any bcm43xx in /etc/modprobe.preload and any 'alias wlan0 bcm43xx' in /etc/modprobe.conf

 

Use the .inf file with ndiswrapper.

 

reboot and see what happens. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I did all that and still no luck. It scans for my network and can't find it. I don't know if this means anything or not but when I go to hardware and click on my wireless card it shows modules bcm43xx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when I go to hardware and click on my wireless card it shows modules bcm43xx.

Check in the /etc/modprobe.preload.d directory and remove any bcm43xx... if it's there? Try again, and if that doesn't work:

 

I've never tried this (so I'm not responsible for anything that goes wrong), but you could rename it, so the system can't find it?

cd /lib/modules/2.6.17-5mdv/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx
mv bcm43xx.ko.gz no-bcm43xx.ko.gz

you may need to use depmod to update the 'system.map' for this to work properly... I'm not sure? Maybe someone else here knows?

 

Good luck! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought but have you checked /etc/modprobe.conf for the line
 alias wlan0 ndiswrapper

this will tell wlan0 which driver to use.

If there isn't one then add it.

 

Yes I added it after I removed the one for the native driver. I'm going to try and find the time to reinstall this afternoon. I hope that goes well. I had problems with my last installation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought but have you checked /etc/modprobe.conf for the line
 alias wlan0 ndiswrapper

this will tell wlan0 which driver to use.

If there isn't one then add it.

 

won't make a difference. It's the other way around. It tells ndiswrapper to call the wireless card wlan0, rather than the next available ethX. So it's more aesthetic and isnt required.

 

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't make a difference. It's the other way around. It tells ndiswrapper to call the wireless card wlan0, rather than the next available ethX. So it's more aesthetic and isnt required.

Maybe a poor choice of words, opening my mouth before putting my brain in gear. I also was looking at LE2005 release, one that I haven't upgraded yet. The alias is needed in that release as I have just tried without and I was unable to connect. I didn't dig any deeper because of time restraint. I must try and choose my words very carefully with you guys, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...