bvc Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 (edited) the pkg is rpm-build but the command is rpmbuild...I know...stupid in light of most pkging you could have done rpm -ql rpm-build and found the /usr/bin entry showing you /usr/bin/rpmbuild man rpm man urpmi man urpm<all at the bottom of urpmi's manpage> man rpm shows you rpm -ql that you could have used above if we hold the spoon, you'll never learn to feed yourself. The time we spend answering all these questions should be your time spent in reading manpages. Am I saying RTM? You bet! Else, you learn nothing and spend the rest of your unix life on forums. If it's because you are concerned with breaking something then you shouldn't be compiling. Bottom line. Sorry, but 3/4 pages of post for one app, w/o any real compile errors is pushing it, IMO. cya Edited January 27, 2005 by bvc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anon Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c One of the reasons you have had problems is because the Easy-Urpmi site is for the Mandrake Distro. Your running Red Hat so some of the files you need will probably not be available from Easy -Urpmi or may not be compatable. Am moving this topic to the "Other Linux Distro's" forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper_Maniac Posted January 27, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 the pkg is rpm-build but the command is rpmbuild...I know...stupid in light of most pkgingyou could have done rpm -ql rpm-build and found the /usr/bin entry showing you /usr/bin/rpmbuild man rpm man urpmi man urpm<all at the bottom of urpmi's manpage> man rpm shows you rpm -ql that you could have used above if we hold the spoon, you'll never learn to feed yourself. The time we spend answering all these questions should be your time spent in reading manpages. Am I saying RTM? You bet! Else, you learn nothing and spend the rest of your unix life on forums. If it's because you are concerned with breaking something then you shouldn't be compiling. Bottom line. Sorry, but 3/4 pages of post for one app, w/o any real compile errors is pushing it, IMO. cya <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks. I guess I should have expected that soon(the spoon part I mean). One of the reasons you have had problems is because the Easy-Urpmi site is for the Mandrake Distro. Your running Red Hat so some of the files you need will probably not be available from Easy -Urpmi or may not be compatable. Am moving this topic to the "Other Linux Distro's" forum. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uhm I not running Red Hat. Mandrake has been the only linux distro on my PC. It doesnt matter anyways. The thread is pretty much done now. I gotta start figuring this stuff out on my own. bvc, Steve Scrimpshire, and Qchem for your help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spinynorman Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 One of the reasons you have had problems is because the Easy-Urpmi site is for the Mandrake Distro. Your running Red Hat so some of the files you need will probably not be available from Easy -Urpmi or may not be compatable. Am moving this topic to the "Other Linux Distro's" forum. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uhm I not running Red Hat. Mandrake has been the only linux distro on my PC. In which case I'll move it back again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 the pkg is rpm-build but the command is rpmbuild...I know...stupid in light of most pkgingyou could have done rpm -ql rpm-build and found the /usr/bin entry showing you /usr/bin/rpmbuild man rpm man urpmi man urpm<all at the bottom of urpmi's manpage> man rpm shows you rpm -ql that you could have used above if we hold the spoon, you'll never learn to feed yourself. The time we spend answering all these questions should be your time spent in reading manpages. Am I saying RTM? You bet! Else, you learn nothing and spend the rest of your unix life on forums. If it's because you are concerned with breaking something then you shouldn't be compiling. Bottom line. Sorry, but 3/4 pages of post for one app, w/o any real compile errors is pushing it, IMO. cya <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks. I guess I should have expected that soon(the spoon part I mean). One of the reasons you have had problems is because the Easy-Urpmi site is for the Mandrake Distro. Your running Red Hat so some of the files you need will probably not be available from Easy -Urpmi or may not be compatable. Am moving this topic to the "Other Linux Distro's" forum. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uhm I not running Red Hat. Mandrake has been the only linux distro on my PC. It doesnt matter anyways. The thread is pretty much done now. I gotta start figuring this stuff out on my own. bvc, Steve Scrimpshire, and Qchem for your help. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> hey, we're here to help after normal, common, basic resources are exhausted, so don't feel like you shouldn't ask for help afterward! I was not trying to be rude but felt it needed to be said, not just for you in this thread but for all that may read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anon Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type.. . i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gowator Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type.. . i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Could this be because he has installed redhat c++ or utilities? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anon Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 Could this be because he has installed redhat c++ or utilities? Not sure, but the above is quoted from page one. Were now on page five !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 (edited) interesting first post checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu second post checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu Viper, what happened between these 2 post? what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say? Edited January 28, 2005 by bvc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper_Maniac Posted January 31, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 hey, we're here to help after normal, common, basic resources are exhausted, so don't feel like you shouldn't ask for help afterward! I was not trying to be rude but felt it needed to be said, not just for you in this thread but for all that may read it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Its ok. I know you werent trying to be rude. Someone had to say it and you did. interesting first post checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu second post checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnuchecking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu Viper, what happened between these 2 post? what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> [root@localhost eben]# rpm -qa | grep gcc gcc-cpp-3.4.1-4mdk gcc-c++-3.4.1-4mdk libgcc1-3.4.1-4mdk gcc-3.4.1-4mdk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted February 1, 2005 Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 weird so did ya get it? localhost:/# urpmf silc.pcsilc-toolkit-devel:/usr/lib/pkgconfig/silc.pc localhost:/# urpmf --description --summary silc-toolkit-devel silc-toolkit-devel:summary:SILC toolkit silc-toolkit-devel:description:SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) is a protocol which provides secure conferencing services on the Internet over insecure channel. SILC is IRC-like software although internally they are very different. The biggest similarity between SILC and IRC is that they both provide conferencing services and that SILC has almost the same commands as IRC. Other than that they are nothing alike. Major differences are that SILC is secure what IRC is not in any way. The network model is also entirely different compared to IRC. This package contains all development related files for developing or compiling applications using SILC protocol. localhost:/# Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Scrimpshire Posted February 1, 2005 Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 Not to interrupt, but doesn't this: checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu come from glibc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper_Maniac Posted February 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 (edited) weird so did ya get it? localhost:/# urpmf silc.pcsilc-toolkit-devel:/usr/lib/pkgconfig/silc.pc localhost:/# urpmf --description --summary silc-toolkit-devel silc-toolkit-devel:summary:SILC toolkit silc-toolkit-devel:description:SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) is a protocol which provides secure conferencing services on the Internet over insecure channel. SILC is IRC-like software although internally they are very different. The biggest similarity between SILC and IRC is that they both provide conferencing services and that SILC has almost the same commands as IRC. Other than that they are nothing alike. Major differences are that SILC is secure what IRC is not in any way. The network model is also entirely different compared to IRC. This package contains all development related files for developing or compiling applications using SILC protocol. localhost:/# <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No I didnt. BTW, I got Gaim up and running yesterday. Compiled from source. Havent had any problems yet. Edited February 1, 2005 by Viper_Maniac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.