RadioEar Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 As a hobbyist in computer programming, geek or what ever, I'm interested in seeing what KBasic brings to Linux as far as a high level language is concerned. Began Ramble I cut my teeth writing in Microware Basic09 for OS9, then in M$, GWBasic and QBasic. QBasic is where I learned a little machine language to make system calls to add a little power to basic applications. Visual Basic Text Window system made it possible to compile basic text files to executable stand alone applications and introduce module programming in M$ OS. VB6 for Windows has become so powerful where applications written in C and C++ now can be done in Visual Basic for Windows professional edition. Maybe the reason why I didn’t pursue C and C++ in earnest, but still working and learning C and C++, mostly C++. End Ramble I think KBasic will be good for Linux. Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glitz Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Just out of curiosity, if someone develops commercial applications with KBASIC, how is the QT license handled? Just in case anyone actually knows... Glitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NelsonN Posted November 2, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 I assume that acquiring a QT license for commercial applications will be up to the programmer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.