bvc Posted May 18, 2004 Report Share Posted May 18, 2004 Ok, here is my /etc/fstab:/dev/hdb1 / ext3 defaults 1 1 none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0 /dev/hdb6 /home ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom auto umask=0,user,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,ro,exec 0 0 /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom2 auto umask=0,user,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,ro,exec 0 0 none /mnt/floppy supermount dev=/dev/fd0,fs=ext2:vfat,--,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,sync,codepage=850 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/hdb5 swap swap defaults 0 0 none /mnt/hd supermount dev=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1,fs=ext2:vfat,--,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-1,kudzu,codepage=850 0 0 Ok, so now what do you suggest? My XP is on Primary IDE-Master, Linux is on Primary IDE-Slave. I am clay, mold me. :unsure: anyone? :unsure: so what? now mdk installs based on ide (device only) and not bios? fstab already says hdb.....so it looks good to me IF xp is hda which it 'just' about has to be. So skip the fstab portion>uninstall lilo (because it's on hdb and needs to be on hda)>change the bios>reinstall lilo. I agree....lilo is a nightmare.....I used grub b4 not using any linux loader. Grub is far better IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceStorm Posted May 18, 2004 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2004 Ok, I did the lilo -u and then the mv -f /etc/lilo.conf /etc/lilo.confDEF Switched my BIOS over to boot to hda like normal. Booted off of MDK disk 1 and went into RESCUE. Selected the "reinstall boot loader" from the menu. But then got this error: /mnt/etc/lilo.conf isn't readable, exiting Ok, so I'm thinking that now I have no boot loader. What now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted May 18, 2004 Report Share Posted May 18, 2004 get to rescue mode and choose; Mount your partitions under /mnt then choose; Go to Console then run; chroot /mnt then run; mv -f /etc/lilo.confDEF /etc/lilo.conf reboot to rescue mode (Ctrl+Alt+Delete) and try to reinstall lilo. Sorry! I thought it wouldn't want the old after an uninstall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceStorm Posted May 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 haha Ok, I couldn't wait. I tried the rescue mode one more time with the same results. So I just went into text mode and selected upgrade and followed the instructions. Well after 20 minutes it was finished with the lilo working and showing both linux and XP. I'M UP So no more for me. I've got sound, and now I'm going to install the nvidia drivers you suggested. Is there a way to get all of the buttons for my mouse working? The 3 main do, but the 2 thumb buttons do not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linux_learner Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 icestorm thats gonna have to do with configuring X. i believe in mandrake its XFdrake from the command line. do this after your video driver is installed. make sure you know your video card (every last detail), your monitor, and your mouse. it will let you test the configuration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 mousedrake I have; 2 buttons 1 thumb button wheel the wheel is 2 so I have a total of 5 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Buttons" "5" EndSection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceStorm Posted May 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 Ok, I've taken the training wheels off my bike and I'm still kind of wobblely. But I'm going foward. So far, I've installed a .run file, etc. I have a question, why must I chmod +x a .run file to get it to run? Lastly, I want to thank you all for your assistance. While not one thing fixed everything, the sheer help I saw from you all reminded me of the old days of DOS 5.0. Hang on, I need a tissue. There are nuances that I must learn and ween myself from the ignorance that MS allows. But I know in time I'lll be up there....still asking the same stupid questions. haha Thank you all for your help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcdragon Posted May 23, 2004 Report Share Posted May 23, 2004 IceStorm the reason for chmod +x filename.run is security. It allows you to control who can run certain programs. Also by making files not runable by deafult when you download them it makes it harder for Trojans and viruses to install you can't simply click on a link by mistake and have software install it's self. Also linux files often don't need or have extensions so this is away of ID ing which files are programs and which are not. Also if you haven't allready you'll want to get urpmi/RPMdrake set up so you can install other programs and security updates for linux easily. This is probably the easiest way to do it. http://urpmi.org/easyurpmi/index.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.