Jump to content

tyme

Platinum
  • Posts

    13108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tyme

  1. Social networks allow people who couldn't meet each other in normal circumstances to socialize
    Most social networks are good when they start and actually try to reach for this altruistic goal. But then they sell out and everything goes to hell in a hand basket.

     

    Myspace -> OK when it started, still a teeny bopper thing -> bought out -> chuck full of adverts and annoying flashing crap.

    Facebook -> Ok when it started, aimed at the college crowd, kept the teenies out ->still privately owned, opened to everyone, added the API, your 12 year old can now write a facebook app that makes me die inside.

    Twitter -> we'll see.

     

    Also, there are many situations when you would not want people socializing with those they would not normally meet. Take note of Myspace's problems with sex offenders.

  2. Notifications need to be interactive
    Notifications are intended as nothing more than a manner of informing the user that something happened, that they may not be aware of. Once it tells you, they should disappear (after a set amount of time). This is how most notification systems I've seen have worked. Unfortunately, they all suck in that they have no flood control (that I've seen) - i.e., in OS X, if I'm uploading files via Cyberduck and my connection dies I get a screen full of errors (one for each file that fails) from Cyberduck via Growl.

     

    Hence, for me, notifications get turned off until someone (not it) does a better implementation.

  3. Herein lies a fundamental problem with linux.
    Correction, here-in lies the problem with distributions that use point release cycles. This is NOT a problem with distributions that have a rolling release cycle. Additionally, it is a problem in other OS's too - not all applications for OS X run on OS X 10.2, not all applications for Windows run on Windows 2000.

     

    As for if things will get complicated, I'd guess they would. If I recall correctly, some of the compiz deps have new versions on 2009.1 (i.e. xorg), which that compiz package would have been built against, making it incompatible with 2008.1.

  4. instead of the space wasting 2 panel setup
    Because those 32 or so pixels (less/more depending on your settings) are absolutely vital, and needed on a regular basis. Without those few pixels the desktop would just be totally unusable. You wouldn't be able to get ANYTHING done.

     

    Perhaps you should look into GNOME's settings for the notification service. It seems the problem is there, not with Ubuntu, as this seems to be distro independent, and they may have a setting where you can tell it which corner to display them in. If not, turn 'em off - I always do. Stupid things are damn annoying, and if you think the 2 panel setup is space wasting I'm not sure why you would want notifications.

  5. Has anyone bothered to ask WHY Texstar went on hiatus? Perhaps he had a very valid reason for doing so. Maybe "real life" issues needed to be taken care of.

     

    Perhaps him coming back right before release was simply to ensure the released product was up to his standards, and when it wasn't, he wanted changes.

     

    It is his project. He gave heads up he was going on hiatus, entrusted leading of the project to someone else until his return. Everyone seems to know he was going to return, yet they are all surprised by it and his intent to release a product that is up to his standards? The very standards that created the distribution in the first place?

     

    Sounds like a bunch of whiny b*****s to me. If it only took 2 weeks to make the changes, I have a feeling they weren't really that big of a deal, but a few sour grapes turned into a bad box of wine (as if boxed wine is ever good), and all the dev's were drinking from it.

     

    Additionally, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if some of these dev's had a personal issue with being headed up by someone of the opposite sex.

  6. Why are Windows, OS X, Solaris etc. listed as "Legacy OS"? A "Legacy OS" would be NeXTSTEP, OS/2, etc. - the listed ones are simply "Not Linux".

     

    I did not vote as there is no option for "shit ton of different operating systems" or "depends on my needs at the time".

  7. Fedora or the NSA spyware Red Hat bundles with it.
    There is no known spyware from the NSA in Fedora. The code is open source, and anyone can review it, if there was a backdoor, some smart, paranoid developer would have already found it and exposed it. Instead, people just continue to perpetuate a rumor based on conjecture.

     

    But nice try on the conspiracy theory. I did get a good chuckle reading your contributions to this thread.

     

    Big corporations and governments pose a much greater security risk than crackers or terrorists in the today's global fascist police state.
    I think your political commentary is better left for OTW. It's not really relevant in this discussion. Then again, bringing up a thread that's over a year old just to post some paranoid, political stuff is kind of irrelevant on it's own.
  8. I believe you need to use "set", though I'm not versed in it's syntax:

    http://www.fishshell.org/user_doc/commands.html#set

    In fact I have to admit that I don't use fish myself, but found a linke to some useful docs. Another version is here:

    Fish user docs

     

    I supposed you needed the export of your path variable:

     

    "Exporting variables

     

    Variables in fish can be exported. This means the variable will be inherited by any commands started by fish. It is convention that exported variables are in uppercase and unexported variables are in lowercase."

    :blink:

  9. payasam - I'm not sure if it's removable, but it's certainly not a 3d desktop thing. It's a Nautilus setting, most likely - I would check in the GNOME Configuration Editor (which is a pain to navigate). Sorry I don't have specifics.

  10. set PATH[7] /opt

     

    This command will set /opt as the 7th entry in your environment variable PATH.

     

    It does seem to be a lot easier than the 'export' command in bash.

    But what's it do if you have 8 entry's in PATH already? Does it overwrite #7, or does it shift 7 to 8 and 8 to 9, then put the new one in 7? There has to be a way to do it that doesn't risk overwriting existing PATH entries.
  11. i am using a vary fast cable net 100mbit/up down but when sy is downloading from me he/she only has a speed of maximum 250kbyte/sec they all have better connection then that.

    1 - a bit is not the same as a byte (maybe you were aware of this)

    2 - there are more factors when it comes to download speed than how fast the server end users connections are. it also depends on all the hops (connections/routers/etc) in between the two, the current traffic at those hops, the number of hops, and whether the wind is blowing to the west or to the east during the last equinox.

    3 - 250kbyte/sec is a pretty good speed, IMHO. I've gotten worse speeds from close (hop-wise) servers with a "phat pipe"

×
×
  • Create New...