Jump to content

Gul Dukat

Members
  • Posts

    693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gul Dukat

  1. I'm planning on installing Fedora 8 on several systems this weekend. But I've been testing the Test-versions from day 1. Are there already some people who got codec-buddy to work? Just a bit curious. I couldn't seem to get it working in any of the Test-releases.

  2. Nice to see its solved... but for the record, you can remove "Java-1.5.0-gcj".

    Unless some other packages (e.g. Openoffice) are built against the gcj java, you will never need it- the Sun 1.7.0 will do everything for you.

    AFAIK Mandriva's OOo doesn't explicitly need java-gcj, so you may safely remove it.

    Ok, thanks.

    But for now I will let it be. But I will certainly try to remove it on a test-setup, but not on this rig. Thanks for the info.

  3. Thanks for your reply, Scarecrow.

    But currently I have Java-1.5.0-gcj installed along with the devel package. But I also have java-1.7.0-icedtea installed along with the devel package and it's Firefox plugin. When running tests on the Sun-site, I get a message of running the latest Java available. As you can clearly see in the log-file.

    java.version=1.7.0
    java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.
    BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=en_US

  4. Hi,

     

    I installed Mandriva 2008 without a problem on one of my systems here. So far so good. Added the sources to my urpmi-configuration and installed java. To be exact, java-1.7.0icedtea and the plugin. Java works fine unde Firefox, which I checked at the sun site. But it doesn't when I try to start Eclipse. Eclipse gives me the following error:

    An error has occurred. See the log file
    /home/guldukat/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.3.0-mdv/configuration/1192401374958.log.

    This is what the log-file says:

    !SESSION 2007-10-14 18:36:14.279 -----------------------------------------------
    eclipse.buildId=I20070625-1500
    java.version=1.7.0
    java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.
    BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=en_US
    Framework arguments:  -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never
    Command-line arguments:  -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86 -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never
    
    !ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.app 2007-10-14 18:36:18.712
    !MESSAGE Product org.eclipse.sdk.ide could not be found.
    
    !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2007-10-14 18:36:18.810
    !MESSAGE Application error
    !STACK 1
    java.lang.RuntimeException: No application id has been found.
    at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppContainer.startDefaultApp(EclipseAppContainer.java:229)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppContainer.start(EclipseAppContainer.java:92)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.Activator.addingService(Activator.java:129)
    at org.osgi.util.tracker.ServiceTracker$Tracked.trackAdding(ServiceTracker.java:1064)
    at org.osgi.util.tracker.ServiceTracker$Tracked.track(ServiceTracker.java:1042)
    at org.osgi.util.tracker.ServiceTracker$Tracked.serviceChanged(ServiceTracker.java:967)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.FilteredServiceListener.serviceChanged(FilteredServiceListener.java:94)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.dispatchEvent(BundleContextImpl.java:1224)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager.dispatchEvent(EventManager.java:195)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.ListenerQueue.dispatchEventSynchronous(ListenerQueue.java:141)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.publishServiceEventPrivileged(Framework.java:1603)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.publishServiceEvent(Framework.java:1578)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.ServiceRegistrationImpl.<init>(ServiceRegistrationImpl.java:103)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.createServiceRegistra
    ion(BundleContextImpl.java:657)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.registerService(BundleContextImpl.java:609)
    at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.registerService(BundleContextImpl.java:675)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:359)
    at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:623)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:504)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:443)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1169)
    at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1144)

    I still think it has something to do with Java. But I don't know exactly what. Hope one of you can help me out here.

    Thanks in advance.

  5. Gul, check your speed by checking the stuff in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ . It's more accurate. cpuinfo_cur_freq is the current frequency, cpuinfo_max_freq is the max, cpuinfo_min_freq is the min, and scaling_governor tells you what frequency scaling strategy is currently being used.

    Adamw, I don't think there' s a lot of difference between the command cat /proc/cpuinfo and the directory you gave me. As you can see here:

    linux-ftxr:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq # cat cpuinfo_cur_freq
    800000
    linux-ftxr:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq # cat cpuinfo_min_freq
    800000
    linux-ftxr:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq # cat cpuinfo_max_freq
    2000000
    linux-ftxr:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq # cat scaling_governor
    ondemand

  6. Your "cat /proc/cpuinfo" was absolutely accurate- what's wrong about that?

    Nothing. But I thought it would run at 800Mhz continuously. That's why I started this topic. Don't get me wrong.

    But the cpu runs at 800Mhz idle, but when it's under stress it should go up. Right? I hope I get it straight now.

    sorry and thank you for your time. :)

  7. Yes it is, but I don't see the FSB listed.

    And you mean that as my cpu is idle it runs at 1,6 Ghz, and under stress it would probably run 2,0 Ghz. Right?

    Mmm, oke. So my "panic" was about nothing. Would gkrellm give me a better reflection of my cpu or/and are there better programs to keep this monitored?

  8. Everything is fine!

    The FSB of that CPU is 1600 MHz - AMD never puts in the box the real CPU FSB, and this applies for all AMD CPU's.

    I'm sorry Scarecrow. I don't fully comprehend what you mean by this.

  9. I have a Acer Ferrari 4005 WLMI laptop, which has a AMD Mobile Turion 64 ML37 onboard. This cpu is suppose to run @ 2.0 Ghz.

    But recently I found out that it doesn't run at 2.0 Ghz. As you can see with the following command:

    [guest@localhost ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor	   : 0
    vendor_id	   : AuthenticAMD
    cpu family	  : 15
    model		   : 36
    model name	  : AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology ML-37
    stepping		: 2
    cpu MHz		 : 800.000
    cache size	  : 1024 KB
    fpu			 : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level	 : 1
    wp			  : yes
    flags		   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm
    bogomips		: 1593.47
    TLB size		: 1024 4K pages
    clflush size	: 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc

    I've tried all kinds of different Live-CD's, both x86 and x86_64, but all of them let my cpu run at 800 Mhz. How on earth can I let run at 2.0 Ghz?

     

    Thanks in advance.

  10. Hi,

     

    I've just recently reinstalled my laptop, which has ATi Radeon X700 graphical card, decided not to use the closed-source driver from ATi itself, but instead use the opensource driver ati. But I also came across a opensource driver called radeon. I can't seem to find any reference to what the difference is between those 2 drivers, ati and radeon. I was hoping someone here could help me out. I would greatly appreciate that.

     

    Thanks in advance.

×
×
  • Create New...