If flux is lovely, and xfce4 doesn't look very nice to you then, more power to ya, whatever floats your boat :wink: Xfce is gui, flux is...well, colors :roll: (that's as good as I can explain it). I used flux for a long time, blackbox for a short while, and waimea for a while (waimea was much nicer looking), but they just...well they're just bare. That's why we use them though and that's what they're suppose to be. :wink:
QUOTE
I do prefer using a wm to a de, I think
Why?....resources?.....slower? Forget both of those with xfce4. Why? It's not quite a DE yet because it has no session mgr, so there's not a lot running or started when it does, in fact, I'd say it's more a wm. You can run your own startup stuff, but you can't start something, exit, and have it start next time xfce4 starts, and you can't save a session for the same purpose. It's almost as light and everybit as fast as flux. An app is an app is an app that's an app, that uses libs of a de, so either way you're almost starting the same stuff whether de or wm, it just takes a little longer to get there with a wm. Now you can go completely indepentent and not run gnome and kde apps and just run gtk apps. But you become very limited in the apps arena, well anything good that is. :wink:
I'm using xfce4 in Debian, and just like flux, my swap isn't touched unless I'm really pushin' it.