I have packaged FlashPlayer 9 final.
available at the usual place -> www.mde.djura.org
FlashPlayer-9.0.31.0-1mde2007.0.i586.rpm
have fun
Full Version: FlashPlayer 9 final
Why? I mean Adobe makes an rpm of it which worked flawlessly. What's the difference?
QUOTE (dexter11 @ Jan 21 2007, 07:17 PM) 
Why? I mean Adobe makes an rpm of it which worked flawlessly. What's the difference?
Take a good look to where the files are installed with adobe rpm, konqueror and mozilla cant locate it, now check what mde flashplayer rpm does.
QUOTE (mmodem @ Jan 21 2007, 10:09 PM)
Take a good look to where the files are installed with adobe rpm, konqueror and mozilla cant locate it, now check what mde flashplayer rpm does.
CODE
$ ll /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jan 17 17:39 /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so*
$ ll /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.1/plugins/libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jan 17 17:39 /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.1/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so*
$ ll /usr/lib/opera/plugins/libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jan 17 17:39 /usr/lib/opera/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so*
$ ll /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.1/plugins/libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jan 17 17:39 /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.1/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so*
$ ll /usr/lib/opera/plugins/libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Jan 17 17:39 /usr/lib/opera/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so*
The one from adobe made these for me at least...
Correct, the symlinks creation in done during %post and %pre install scripts, so users can choose.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.